Kane's is clearly worse in the sense that it is reckless and borderline violent. Ritchie's is just nasty. I don't think Kane intentionally wants to hurt Lejeune - he just makes a ridiculously poor attempt at a tough tackle. Ritchie wants to clip Alli down - intentionally. All three are red cards for me. Ritchie's might be the "lesser red", but I absolutely hate those kind of tackles. Completely random if Alli's ankle rolls over or not. And I do think Kane survives because I can't think of a time when he has made such a tackle before. He goes to grown occasionally, but he isn't dirty. So when the refs sees it he probably doesn't think it is as bad as it is because he knows Kane won't normally tackle dirty. Wrong in this case, but I can understand why the ref is fooled. Really has nothing to do with Kane being a "darling".