Exactly.
In the end, Sakic needs to tell teams "I will trade you Duchene and you will win the deal short term, but I need to win the deal long term. That's what a fair deal is"
I just hope a different team steps up. The Metro is stacked enough.
My two cents in order of likelihood:
1. Hurricanes (want Hanifin but will settle for Fleury++)
2. Blue Jackets (Murray++)
3. Predators (want Ekholm or Ellis but will settle for Fabbro++)
4. Keep him and make it work since we drafted Makar and Timmons to fill d needs in 2-3 years.
4. Islanders (would have to be Brazal, Pulock, 1st and 2nd (both picks conditional on which is lower, Flames or Isles).
There comes a point where it's just sad that non-Avs fans can't accept that 2 years is a long time and we have plenty of time left to mull offers and see what happens LOL
J F C
What if Duchene gets tired of this circus and demands a trade? I am not sure that it would be in the Avs interest to alienate their star player. Something gotta give.
As a Leafs fan with no horse in this race, some advice, be careful with the "we have a long time" thing.....if Joe waits until next offseason, then Duchene will get the JVR treatment on here. By that i mean once he only has a year left, he will be virtually worthless.
What if Duchene gets tired of this circus and demands a trade? I am not sure that it would be in the Avs interest to alienate their star player. Something gotta give.
All comes down to the player and his performance then. We did it with ROR and that ended up working out.
If Sakic really is reading from Howson's Nash Trade playbook, it won't matter. Hell, Howson was the one who made the trade request public in Nash's case - and then continued to hold out for the return he needed.What if Duchene gets tired of this circus and demands a trade? I am not sure that it would be in the Avs interest to alienate their star player. Something gotta give.
I am not trying to be negative at all, all i am saying is JVR is coming off a 60+ point season....and on this site is worth bupkiss because he's being regarded as a rental.
As far as the ROR deal, you guys lost that one IMO, but i was/am a big ROR fan.
Looking at it now that we just let Grigorenko go, yes. At the time it was a nice haul for a guy we knew we would lose for nothing. It was also a unique situation where I still believe Buffalo knew they were going to re-sign ROR asap. There was no maybe there or else they wouldn't have give. Up so much.
If ROR left buffalo after one year, it would have been a huge loss for them trade wise so all hindsight.
Also have to take in account the huge difference in value between a center and wingers lately.
Hilarious that Av's fans are under the impression that Snow is hounding Sakic 24/7 when there has been exactly ZERO news of Snow doing anything Duchene-related for a while now.
He's obviously made an offer to Sakic and walked away. Good for Snow.
Sakic can ask for whatever he wants. Snow can also offer whatever he wants and leave it up to Joe, which it seems like he's done.
Hasn't been anything since the draft, but then Snow had to be told to stop coming to the Avalanche table. I assume it was all Hamonic related and stopped after that.
So if on the off chance everyone agrees that Sakic is demanding too much in a trade for Duchene, where does that leave us?
I am just curious what the end game is here, or, to put it another way, what is the point?
Proof of this?
I watched the entire draft and never heard them say Snow was talking to Sakic. I'd think they would be tuned into that considering all the rumors flying around. Calling BS on this one
Avalanche BSN podcast. Avs insiders who were at the draft talked about Sakics interactions with Snow and Francis.
I think Sakic never really intended on trading Duchene. He put a line in the water to see what he could catch and nothing overwhelmed him. It's true, the Avs do not have to trade him.... he's also young enough to keep for a rebuild. Sakic had a specific want that he needed in a trade, plus other good pieces. That specific want alone is worth Duchene.... and it's a very specific one.
I think this is the truth. Now you have to account for Duchene "quiting". Do you blame it on the anomaly that was the 2017 season or is it a problem with Duchene? I hope Sakic has spoken with him and has a direction to go in regarding that. Depending on that opinion is going to result in the urgency to get a deal done or not.
All about if Duchene is going to be toxic in the locker room next year. If so, move him. If it is savalgeable, bring him back and waste a year developing young D and plan on being competitive in 18-19.