ChaoticOrange
Registered User
To be fair I think the value is closer here than a lot of the Price threads haha. I guess I put more value in 2 years of Holtby's contract left to 1 year for Talbot as well. The value may not be perfect, but I think this is a good basis if Chia thinks a decent move needs to be made to push EDM back into the playoffs and obviously the Caps need to do some massive retooling if they flame out again. Sometimes a team just needs to be shaken up a bit to wake em up again.
I think we do need a shakeup, but I don’t think it’ll come in the form of jettisoning 10th overall to upgrade (?) our goaltending.
In your scenario Edmonton is the one gambling, and I am not a gambler. You bank on Puljujarvi replacing what Burakovsky brings, and if Talbot sucks, you have Grubauer. Plus you have a shiny tenth overall pick.
Edmonton is left hoping and praying Holtby finds his form, that Burakovsky can take a step forward (actually if I’m being honest the RNH-McDavid-Rattie line produced extremely well and probably wouldn’t be messed with out of the gate - Burakovsky would likely be slotted in with Draisaitl) and that they didn’t do something stupid by ignoring all the defencemen potentially available at 10 (or Wahlstrom).
Which is what it boils down to for me. I think Edmonton is better off both short and long term with Talbot, Puljujarvi, and Wahlstrom/Bouchard/Smith/Hughes/whoever vs Holtby/Burakovsky/Florida 2nd/throw-in prospects.