How this team thinks rentals are a good idea I'm not sure.
This year or ever? ... This team has gotten good mileage out of UFA's at the deadline, even without making the massive 1st, top prospect, decent player for an aging star deal.
pointless trade unless they resign him even then, inconsistent and injuries
6 Years between 0.83-1.00 PPG as a 1st liner with mediocre linemates.
Then 3 years 0.52, 0.53 and 0.53 as a 2nd liner with even worse linemates.
I'm not sure that it gets much more consistent than that. Injuries are the problem, not inconsistency.
only 7 goals before last nights game.
You realize that he's a playmaker right? One who had been playing with Gordon and Smyth.
Well, I am now a Senators fan for the rest of this season at least. I think you guys will come around on Hemsky, he's really an electrifying player and should be motivated for the playoff drive. He seems to have lost a little bit of his touch, but some of his passes will leave you shaking your head.
The funny thing is that if it had been Havlat, quite a few more "No's" would have switched to the "Yes" side just based on familiarity with Havlat's skill level. Not realizing that they're practically the same damn player and that Hemsky is a couple years younger.
Phillips getting paid less than average league salary....given everything about Phillips, he's better than any veteran Dman they could have picked up to fill the veteran dman spot on the roster.
I don't know who's available, but I know the type of d-man we need. There are too many d-men on the roster already and even paying Phillips $2.5M is a substantial hit to an internal budget. The roster spot and the salary will either cost us a kid on defense or our ability to acquire the player that we need.
Yeah, just like Cheechoo in SJ.
Cheechoo had
two years as a 1st liner playing with
Thornton and Marleau.
Hemsky had
six years as a 1st liner playing with
Smyth and Horcoff.
Hemsky carried his line and Cheechoo was carried by his linemates.
I feel the same way I did after the Bondra trade.
It's a good trade on paper. I just think we simply didn't need an Ales Hemsky type of player.
Bondra was a RW acquired by a team with Alfie, Hossa and Havlat on it's top 3 lines and all 3 squeezed onto it's top PP unit. That team didn't need a RW or finesse. It needed a LW with size and talent.
This team only has Bobby Ryan taking up a RW spot on the top-2 lines and not a lot of offensive talent on either wing behind Ryan. Plus, it was figuratively losing Alfredsson to decline before he left. Skating, stickhandling and playmaking were 3 big attributes that we were losing with Alfredsson (amongst others)... those are Hemsky's strengths.
I'm now rooting for you guys to make the playoffs and hopefully go very deep. Take good care of Hemsky for us. He was a good warrior for us. One of the most underrated players in the league. He'll make plays that leave you wondering why he's not an perennial 80 point player.
He's not the typical skill winger guy though. He's not soft at all. He goes into areas that others avoid, which is why he's had so many injury problems throughout his career. He's good defensively as well, and while he may not be a guy who speaks a lot, he's all heart. Good luck to Hemsky and the Sens.
Thank you for this.
Haven't seen too much Hemsky but when I have seen him he's looked impressive. Although it is a bit concerning he's gone from being practically a PPG player down to about 0.5PPG player over the past few seasons
Eberle replaced him on the top line and 1st PP unit due in no small part to Hemsky's injuries.
2005-2011 = roughly 4 mins PP time (22% of total ice time)... 82-22-53-75 pace.
2011-2014 = roughly 2.4 mins PP time (15% of total ice time)... 82-14-28-42 pace.
The trade is ok. PRoblem is Vanek got obtained for a 2nd a conditional 5th back from NYI if they make the playoffs (Habs). I don't see how Murray wasn't all over that, he gives Snow a 2nd and 5th for Vanek, or a 3rd and 5th? We get a much better player and true sniper.
Vanek was obtained for two 2nd's (Collberg and a 2nd with easily achievable conditions). Low for a player of his calibre, but still two 2nd's. Not a 2nd and 5th. Plus, he was making $7M and as a UFA who's walked away from 2 teams this year, wasn't likely to accept a decrease.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say Hemsky will score more points in a Sens jersey than Vanek in a Habs jersey.
Most years, when top end PPG UFA's go a 1st, top prospect and a decent player at the deadline. Teams are hoping that they can fit into a new line & system well enough in a short period of time to even produce 20-25 points in the 30 regular season and playoff games they'll play in.
Cory Stillman produced 21 points in 28 games after being acquired for Patick Eaves... and people regularly use that deal as an example of a rental failure here.
Being reckless with draft picks tends not to be good for long term planning.
It's hard to be reckless with 3rd's and 5th's. 1st's and 2nd's sure.
2 games in and everyone wants to sign the guy. Weren't people here happy with the Greening deal after his 17 goal season too? Look at him now
Colin Greening is only 2.5 years younger than Hemsky and his career high achieved riding the coattails of Spezza-Michalek is less than half of Hemsky's career high achieved while carrying Smyth-Horcoff.
Yes, and what has he done that is so significant in the past few seasons?
Declined to the point where he is disappointing, yet still greatly outproducing Greening and Regin... whilst still being young enough to rebound.
This has Peter Regin written all over it. I'm pretty sure everyone thought he was a bona-fide top 6 forward and given an extension after 1 decent playoff round against the Penguins.
Hemsky is a bonified top-6 forward.
Regin was only given a $1M deal and started getting hurt after he got it.
Not sure where you were going with this one at all.