Yeah ok ans RNH per you was worth more than 3OV.Edmonton shouldn’t be doing this without at least one of Montreal’s seconds coming too.
You don't think Kotkaniemi falls to 10? Which of Hughes/Wahlstrom/Tkachuk/Dobson/Boqvist/Dobson/Bouchard do you think falls instead?Galchenyuk is worth more than the 10OA. Pretty weak odds that the 10OA becomes better than Chucky. But i agree with some posters. I'd do it only if one of Hughes or Kotkaniemi is still there, which will most probably not happen.
Galchy is worth more. Upside of 80points
The only deal i would be ready to make with Edm including Galchenyuk is for Klefbom.
Habs would need to add a piece though.
Galchy is worth more. Upside of 80points
You're joking right? Try adding to all your future posts regarding GalchenyukDog **** for surefire ppg player
ThisYeah ok ans RNH per you was worth more than 3OV.
Alot of logic there.
You're joking right? Try adding to all your future posts regarding Galchenyuk
He will never be a PPG player over a full season.
This is a bad, bad trade proposal. Montreal should get rid of Bergevin and Julien. Or they should trade Galchenyuk. Knowing Montreal, Habs fans are stuck with a *****ebag GM and a **** of a coach for the next 10 yars. Anyways, I don't see Alex making it in Montreal. He needs a fresh start and a good coach. Screw Montreal, for real.
Guessing Hughes out of those three. He seems like the riskiest pick.
so you would keep galchenyuk over the chance to grab a prospect with top pairing potential like hughes then?
so you would keep galchenyuk over the chance to grab a prospect with top pairing potential like hughes then?
so you would keep galchenyuk over the chance to grab a prospect with top pairing potential like hughes then?
Yeah ok ans RNH per you was worth more than 3OV.
Alot of logic there.
OP should have just made it Galchenyuk for Kotkaniemi proposal.
Pumping Galy up as a PPG player is homerism at best. We might buy it if you call him a potential 60 pt player.
Galchy is worth more. Upside of 80points
Well RNH is a better, more consistent, and more well rounded player than Galchenyuk, so...
No. His value would go up if he actually played like a PPG player which very much up to debate.The minute the Habs trade Galchenyuk, his value goes up the roof (like Subban). No way we are trading him as a 50 pts player. He is only age 24 and just touching his prime years while playing in a forward group that don't have much skill or depth at center.
I know why other teams are interested in Galchenyuk. Cause they know the potential is there. But you don't want to admit it cause you want to acquire for cheap cause he is not trending well. I prefer to keep Galchenyuk and let him mature more. He had a great 2nd half to last year on the wing and Julien is taking a different approach with him. His game can completely change if we find a top 2 center to play with him.... Other than Danault, DLR, Pleky, DD, or Drouin.
Based on what, exactly? The guy’s never broken 60.
No. His value would go up if he actually played like a PPG player which very much up to debate.
As an Oilers fan i had very similar hopes from Yakupov. That did not turned out so well.. We also had the same fears that Eberle's value is going to take off once he is out of Edmonton. It did for a while but is back to the same.
Galchenyuk is 2 yrs away from UFA status. You can project his value all you want but no GM is going to give up a return based on a PPG Galchenyuk.
He needs talent to play with. With Radulov he had 23pts in 25 games and then his season got derailed by a injury. There has been flashes where you see the offensive potential. Julien will help him become a more mature player but at the end of the day, he needs support and skill around him.
Everyone has flashes of greatness, it’s the ability to do it consistently that sets the 80 point players apart. I mean Ty Rattie had 9 points in 14 games with us but no one is pencilling him in for a 60 point season next year.