GDT: ECF Game 2 New York Rangers vs Montreal Canadiens 5/19/14 8:00pm EST CBC,NBCCN,RDS

[habtastic]

played while watching this works too:

Did the puck go wide or does Price make the save there? Gotta say, that's some dedication by him to do anything to stop the puck with that fk face bearing down on him, almost like he's surprised when they do collide.

Really hoping the next goalie Krieder kills is the boards.

 

[Cole Caulifield]

Therrien said it was a reckless play and that he has a history of it. Being reckless simply means not having any concern with regards to the consequences or not showing proper caution, and Kreider does seem rather reckless in his style. Emelin whack or not, he was going to crash into Price because he was fully committed to executing his shot attempt at all costs. Reckless indeed. But intentional is different from reckless, and only Kreider knows that.

Therrien just said that Kreider has a history of purposely running goalies today. He said : Kreider, we talked about him yesterday, and it's not the first time he hits a goalie on purpose.

 

[Kobe Armstrong]

your goalie gets knocked out...

all 5 players on the ice act like its nothing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agL3NHgb8Rk

I'd watch but you posted a link to youtube like it's ****ing 2006

 

[CrazyShea]

first, none of this happens if it was a 7 oclock start.

second, what's the line up tonight?

third, go habs go

lastly, fucale fucale fucale

Omg never even thought of this. We should be abusing Bettman and NBC!

 

[BAS7ARD1Z3R]

so we got Toka goal tonight?

 

[Camio]

If you want to assert that someone intentionally did something, intent is the WHOLE CRUX of the matter. Just like murder vs. manslaughter, intent is the primary difference that distinguishes the two.

The elbow vs MAF in the previous round and the skates first vs Price are all thats required to make a judgement.

 

[HuGo Sham]

If you want to assert that someone intentionally did something, intent is the WHOLE CRUX of the matter. Just like murder vs. manslaughter, intent is the primary difference that distinguishes the two.

as i mentioned on the main board - a good analogy i heard today. when a pitcher comes inside he has a responsibility not to hit batter and injure him. The onus is on kreider to not be reckless and he is

 

[No Mercy]

Yeah Tokarski

 

[Inked87]

POSITIVE VIIIIIIIIIIIIIIBEZ!! Tokarski will hopefully lead us to the Stanley Cup Finals Ya never know guys.... If the Habs win tonight, they'll win the series.

 

[SirClintonPortis]

Therrien just said that Kreider has a history of purposely running goalies today. He said : Kreider, we talked about him yesterday, and it's not the first time he hits a goalie on purpose.

I did hear Therrien use the word reckless, meaning that Kreider didn't show proper caution in the play. I also heard him say that he has a history of these incidents. But I did hear the words on purpose, intentional, or other synonyms in his presser.

 

[habtastic]

If you want to assert that someone intentionally did something, intent is the WHOLE CRUX of the matter. Just like murder vs. manslaughter, intent is the primary difference that distinguishes the two.

If you drive drunk, are you intending to kill people?

What do we do to and think about people who drive drunk?

reckless is reckless, but it's not a far jump from intentional.

btw, therrien IIRC did NOT say "on purpose" or "intentional"

 

[MSLs absurd thighs]

Bergevin will change the culture if some of his McCarron/Crisp/JDLR picks pan out. The previous regime went with our type of zero muscle lineup which only put them at the mercy of officials. Officials aren't there to be judges, they control game flow and will just as soon put 2 guys in the box as 1, and the retaliator in the box over the instigator. They don't care about fair. The team needs the sneaky in the shadows players that get into the heads of opposition and will dish out payback when it needs to be done.

Listen, I hate Matt Cooke, but he might have been a guy to have around last game. He's got "payback" down to an art. I mean the guy took out the Norris trophy defenseman on a blatent foul and got away with it. As for Lucic, he's a ****** but how many spears has he got away with? You know what they say about nice guys, they win Lady Byng trophies and finish with the virtual Classy Cup

It sickens me that there is no response to a dangerous play and the officials even turned it around to overpunish the retaliators.

It disgusts me that some fans are still embrassing this ********, being the classiest on the ice and stuff.

I wish our team would be more like the Bruins and less like what we were after the incident last game.

I have to stop thinking about it. Everytime I review the sequence in my head, I can't help but being incredibly angry at Prust. The guy is dead to me. I'm done with that metrosexual clown. ****, my garage league goalie gets ran less than this, and I'm giving more **** to the guy than Prust did to Kreider in a SCP game.

 

[Lafleurs Guy]

so we got Toka goal tonight?

That's the word.

 

[Habarazzi]

[/QUOTE]


I've seen this video so many times now (and from many angles) .... It's the Habs fan's version of the Zapruder Film .....

 

[David Suzuki]

3 hours.

 

[SirClintonPortis]

The elbow vs MAF in the previous round and the skates first vs Price are all thats required to make a judgement.

It could very well be that he is an opportunist who takes advantages of the "accidents" he creates but throws in a little intentional shot if the situation presents itself.

 

[ThaDevilGirl]

3 hours.

2 and a half

 

[PuckSeparator]

The elbow vs MAF in the previous round and the skates first vs Price are all thats required to make a judgement.

When **** keeps following you wherever you go, maybe it's you that stinks. Had a person with a pretty big rap sheet, ehm ehm, done this he would have been suspended indefinitely. But hey Krabs boy is a good kid, no WAY he would ever do something like this one purpose.

 

[PriceIsGod]

It disgusts me that some fans are still embrassing this ********, being the classiest on the ice and stuff.

I wish our team would be more like the Bruins and less like what we were after the incident last game.

I have to stop thinking about it. Everytime I review the sequence in my head, I can't help but being incredibly angry at Prust. The guy is dead to me. I'm done with that metrosexual clown.

Take a look at our captain, NOW, take a loot at the bruins captain. Did you spot a difference? There's a reason we can't play there game.

 

[Camio]

It could very well be that he is an opportunist who takes advantages of the "accidents" he creates but throws in a little intentional shot if the situation presents itself.

Put it this way: he's quickly becoming the Sean Avery/Matt Cooke of crashing into goalies and he's only been playing in the NHL for what, 90 games?

You need some sort of dedication to achieve Avery/Cooke like greatness in a span so short.

 

[habtastic]

It could very well be that he is an opportunist who takes advantages of the "accidents" he creates but throws in a little intentional shot if the situation presents itself.

Wouldn't mind Tinordi for a game.

(But would go with current lineup...plzzz no Murray!!!)

 

[David Suzuki]

2 and a half

wont start right at 9

 

[SirClintonPortis]

If you drive drunk, are you intending to kill people?

What do we do to and think about people who drive drunk?

reckless is reckless, but it's not a far jump from intentional.

btw, therrien IIRC did NOT say "on purpose" or "intentional"

Reckless acts can be just as bad results-wise as intentional acts, as your example shows; I am not disputing that. I am talking about whether the act is or is not intentional. Even I'm flip-flopping at times because the play is so "on the edge", so to speak.

 

[Lafleurs Guy]

If you want to assert that someone intentionally did something, intent is the WHOLE CRUX of the matter. Just like murder vs. manslaughter, intent is the primary difference that distinguishes the two.

Well, there's that whole thing about 'reckless disregard'...

He doesn't hurt him on purpose but he doesn't really care if he gets hurt. He just slams into the goalie... if the goalie gets hurt - oh well.

As was pointed out earlier though, Gallagher's in our lineup and does pretty much the same thing. Unlike Kreider though, he's a smurf.

 

[habtastic]

3 hours.

...as I was saying: reckless