Who was providing the net presence? Who was providing the point shot that demanded respect from the opposition?
The answer to both those questions is no one.
Was Eakins responsible for Justin Schultz and his deplorable defensive zone coverage? Was Eakins responsible for the putrid goaltending.
No he wasnt.
This rebuild was destroyed before Eakins got here. You are implying that this roster is a tweak or 2 away from success.
Its great that you have made excuses for these professional players but after multiple coaches the finger has to point at the roster.
Thats exactly where it should point because this is a weak, soft team that will not be coached into being a successful team with out changes.
History has proven that beyond a doubt.
Yes. Eakins is responsible for defensive coverage. The Oilers weren't just "bad" under Eakins, they were unbelievably bad.
2010-11 - 269 goals against, 62 points (Year 1 Of Rebuild, Renney)
2011-12 - 239 goals against, 74 points (Year 2 Of Rebuild, Renney) +30 GA improvement, 12 points+
2012-13 - 229 goals against (prorated), 77 points (prorated) (Year 3 Of Rebuild, Krueger) +10 GA, 3 points+
2013-14 - 270 goals against, 67 points (Year 4 of "Rebuild", Eakins Style) -41 GA, -13 points.
2014-15 - Even worse in both categories under Dallas.
Eakins destroyed the "rebuild", however shaky it was, it was progressing at least. Firing Renney in the first place was the stupid mistake this organization made, they will pay for it probably for the next 10 years now.
Yes. Eakins is responsible for defensive coverage. The Oilers weren't just "bad" under Eakins, they were unbelievably bad.
2010-11 - 269 goals against, 62 points (Year 1 Of Rebuild, Renney)
2011-12 - 239 goals against, 74 points (Year 2 Of Rebuild, Renney) +30 GA improvement, 12 points+
2012-13 - 229 goals against (prorated), 77 points (prorated) (Year 3 Of Rebuild, Krueger) +10 GA, 3 points+
2013-14 - 270 goals against, 67 points (Year 4 of "Rebuild", Eakins Style) -41 GA, -13 points.
2014-15 - Even worse in both categories under Dallas.
Eakins destroyed the "rebuild", however shaky it was, it was progressing at least. Firing Renney in the first place was the stupid mistake this organization made, they will pay for it probably for the next 10 years now.
Our GA was headed down to the 220 range prior to Eakins, 220 is where you begin to sniff a Wild Card spot. All that was completely undone in the last two years.
Not only that all four of the "wunderkids" in Hall/RNH/Eberle/Yakupov were showing signs of being strong players prior to Eakins, since then ... all four of their development has gone sideways or stagnated.
You are making excuses for a roster that simply isnt nearly good enough.
I have no idea how you can look at this roster and conclude otherwise.
No legit NHL starting goaltender. The goaltending was better with Dubnyk.
1 legit top 4 defender in Fayne. The rest are 5-6 defendors. Not nearly good enough.
The forwards outside of Hendricks and Gordon (both 4th liners) is full of perimeter players. The lack of balance is appalling.
Not nearly good enough.
The team has 2 legit NHL centres.
So I ask you...which teams have a worse roster than the Oilers?
Then how is it they were improving each of the previous three years?
How is it they would show far more glimpses in that time, doing things like blowing out the Blackhawks multiple times?
All improvement abruptly stops with the Eakins hire.
Really this all goes back to the Renney fire, Renney wanted to develop the kids a proper way, Lowe wouldn't have it, fired him, brought up Krueger, who he felt he could control moreso, then hired his best friend with no GMing experience.
But coaching is really the nuts and bolts of development. A GM doesn't develop a player. Neither does the POHO.
90% of Calgary's success right now is because Hartley. He knows what he's doing when it comes to systems play, he knows how to get players to buy in, he knows how hard to work them, he's developed good offensive players before like Tanguay, so it's not shocking that Monahan and Gaudreau are developing well under him.
The Oilers don't want a coach like that behind the bench though. They (being Lowe and Mac Dummy) want a puppet because they feel they know best.
Then how is it they were improving each of the previous three years?
How is it they would show far more glimpses in that time, doing things like blowing out the Blackhawks multiple times?
All improvement abruptly stops with the Eakins hire.
Really this all goes back to the Renney fire, Renney wanted to develop the kids a proper way, Lowe wouldn't have it, fired him, brought up Krueger, who he felt he could control moreso, then hired his best friend with no GMing experience.
But coaching is really the nuts and bolts of development. A GM doesn't develop a player. Neither does the POHO.
90% of Calgary's success right now is because Hartley. He knows what he's doing when it comes to systems play, he knows how to get players to buy in, he knows how hard to work them, he's developed good offensive players before like Tanguay, so it's not shocking that Monahan and Gaudreau are developing well under him.
The Oilers don't want a coach like that behind the bench though. They (being Lowe and Mac Dummy) want a puppet because they feel they know best.
Then how is it they were improving each of the previous three years?
How is it they would show far more glimpses in that time, doing things like blowing out the Blackhawks multiple times?
All improvement abruptly stops with the Eakins hire.
Really this all goes back to the Renney fire, Renney wanted to develop the kids a proper way, Lowe wouldn't have it, fired him, brought up Krueger, who he felt he could control moreso, then hired his best friend with no GMing experience.
But coaching is really the nuts and bolts of development. A GM doesn't develop a player. He's not there day to day with the player.
90% of Calgary's success right now is because Hartley. He knows what he's doing when it comes to systems play, he knows how to get players to buy in, he knows how hard to work them, he's developed good offensive players before like Tanguay, so it's not shocking that Monahan and Gaudreau are developing well under him.
The Oilers don't want a coach like that behind the bench though. They (being Lowe and Mac Dummy) want a puppet because they feel they know best.
I think you answered your own question with this comment. Eakins was given a mandate to play the kids. He did that and they failed miserably. This is all on Lowe, MacT, Howson, and Stauffer. They should all be sent packing.
He was kind of a loser his last couple of years here, not what I'd call an exceptional leader.
Should have kept Renney though. While not perfect, he was doing things right and improvement was being made.
Why fire a coach that just improved your GA by +30, improved your GF +20, is developing all your young kids well (Hall, doing great, Eberle doing great under Renney, RNH looked like a superstar in his first stretch of games), and improved the team by 14 points in year 1 to 2?
Again Lowe/Tambidummy think they're smarter than everyone else.
Because he didn't want to play the kids.... Tells you who's running the show and why I was against Eakins getting the axe at the end. I feel like he got an unfair shake here because he had to follow orders from the hire ups and wasn't able to make his own decisions regarding the lineup and ice time.
Because he didn't want to play the kids.... Tells you who's running the show and why I was against Eakins getting the axe at the end. I feel like he got an unfair shake here because he had to follow orders from the hire ups and wasn't able to make his own decisions regarding the lineup and ice time.
Dallas was too busy keeping donughts away from Terry Jones.
Just because Lowe and Mac T are idiots, doesn't absolve Eakins from being just as stupid.
In fact it stands to reason if our POHO and GM are idiots, that they would then hire an idiot to coach also. In fact I'm not sure why we expected anything else.
Gillis in Vancouver said straight up after they interviewed Eakins that quote "he's not ready". They did not interview him again. Burke in Toronto wouldn't give him a sniff there.
They were smart, they knew Eakins wasn't cut out for the coaching gig at this level yet. The Oilers meanwhile give him a 4 year contract after being sweet talked for an afternoon .
Again look at Calgary. I doubt they would be anywhere near as good if Eakins was coaching them. Hartley is the one who's established their entire identity, work ethic, style of play, and done all the teaching/guidance there. Burke barely has done anything at all.
My question is why hasn't this team made any improvement under MacT or Nelson then? Also why do we see Schultz getting over 20 minutes a night and Marincin still playing in OKC? If Eakins was the biggest issue here the team would have won a game by now, no? If you want to stand up and support the golden boys and the real culprits the OBC go ahead. But your lying to yourself if you don't think that both those groups are bigger issues then the coach ever was.
At this point I think the damage is too far gone. To be honest actually they have played a bit better, but not much.
Besides who says Mac T and Nelson are really good coaches? We hired two rookie coaches who got in over their head, so now a third rookie AHL coach is supposed to fix this mess? If you hire three unprepared people to run your business, do you magically deserve to have success just based on the sheer number of hires you make?
Like I said, just because you pull the knife out of your back, doesn't mean the bleeding is going to miraculously stop or the damage done to your vital organs is suddenly reversed.
All the Oilers did was pull the knife out. They haven't done anything to tend to the wound, and honestly at this point the wound may end up being fatal.
When you have a GM who's been watching the games from the bench and still has Brad ****ing Hunt and Schultz as a duo, you have to be concerned. Same GM who proclaimed Schultz as a future norris potential winner. Marincin's down in the farm still. Although he hasn't play that well this season, we have Brad Hunt who has been hot garbage every time he's been on the ice in the NHL, and yet the plug gets his own oiler number. Lander has one decent game, then gets sent down right after. What does that have to say for the kid's mindset/confidence? Could have send Draisaitl to the WJC, and then juniors, but they keep him here. Great developing. There's absolutely no reason other than the management trying to tank. I could give a crap, if they drafted McEichel. The fact that Stu and crew have been beyond garbage drafting outside the first round concerns me. I hope there's no oiler scouts kids in the draft. Otherwise, it'll be another Musil moment. In regards to the "bleeding" it hasn't ended, with 6 rings employed. I love how that arrogant idiot has been hiding from the media. Let me know when the owner has the balls to come out and address the media, instead of dishing out his annual apology letter. And I quote MacT "Daryl is upset as I am." Start thinking about business over friendship, Mr Katz. Only time you were ever active was in regards of the arena. Bunch of clowns trying to rebuild like the hawks and pens.
Eakins mishandled Marincin's development, that's part of the reason why Brad Hunt is playing.
The roster isn't perfect, the job of the coach is to make sure things are done as best as possible.
Under Eakins we destroyed our PP, destroyed our no.1 goalie, destroyed the development of virtually every year player here.
It is what it is now. This mess will take years to fix now, this is not something that can be fixed overnight.
This isn't a scratch on the wall, this is the entire house is engulfed in fire. We haven't even put out the fire yet.
I wonder how much Eakins knew about how this organization was run before he took the job. Did he come here knowing he was going to be dictated to on how he was supposed to coach this team or was it something he only found out about once training camp started?Because he didn't want to play the kids.... Tells you who's running the show and why I was against Eakins getting the axe at the end. I feel like he got an unfair shake here because he had to follow orders from the hire ups and wasn't able to make his own decisions regarding the lineup and ice time.
He was kind of a loser his last couple of years here, not what I'd call an exceptional leader.
Should have kept Renney though. While not perfect, he was doing things right and improvement was being made.
Why fire a coach that just improved your GA by +30, improved your GF +20, is developing all your young kids well (Hall, doing great, Eberle doing great under Renney, RNH looked like a superstar in his first stretch of games), and improved the team by 14 points in year 1 to 2?
Again Lowe/Tambidummy think they're smarter than everyone else.
Once Renney went public with those comments it changed the perception of this team moving forward.
How can anybody call out a coach knowing full well the Katz and management pulls the strings in the background?
The coach isnt the main issue here. Never was.
I just want that little propaganda pig Stauffer fired along with Lowe/MacT. He makes me sick to my stomach.