Dynamic ticket pricing - yay or nay?

Do you like dynamic ticket pricing as a consumer?


  • Total voters
    50

Karl Eriksson

Boring!
Apr 12, 2007
10,929
5,672
Ottawa
As a consumer, do you like dynamic ticket pricing?

Here is how Wikipedia defines it:

“Dynamic pricing, also referred to as surge pricing, demand pricing, or time-based pricing is a pricing strategy in which businesses set flexible prices for products or service based on current market demand”

Sens have been doing it for years. Just saw that the Sabres are now using it this season. Seems many if not most teams are using it now.

Makes great economic sense for the owners, but I’m trying to tease out the consumer perspective.
 

Not Sure

Registered User
Feb 8, 2016
4,918
1,146
Buffalo
For the aabres I was under the impression dynamic pricing was their system of having tiers of games. A Saturday afternoon game against Toronto is a platinum game and costs $100 for a 300 level ticket, while a Monday night game against Ottawa costs $30 for the same ticket. Maybe I missed active price changes due to demand, if that's the case it's a pretty crappy thing to do, and the team becomes no better than scalpers. Most tickets are bought second hand at the last minute anyways, most of the games are sold out well in advance through season ticket sales and mini packs, and only a comparatively small number of seats are reserved for walk up sale the day of the game, if any.
 

Hischier and Hughes

“I love to hockey”
Jan 28, 2018
9,408
4,357
I clearly dont know much about business fundamentals

I thought ticket prices were already and have always been determined by market demand...

Unless Im misunderstanding
 

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
51,881
14,845
I clearly dont know much about business fundamentals

I thought ticket prices were already and have always been determined by market demand...

Unless Im misunderstanding

In a basic sense, but teams of all sports have been adopting this model lately. Basically there is more variance in price for the same seat now depending on day of week, performance of team, who the opponent is, and other factors. Before, ticket prices were more standard.

Meant to maximize attendance in the lower tier games by making a little cheaper and maximizing revenue are top tier games by making more expensive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockey Outsider

StoneHands

Registered User
Feb 26, 2013
6,608
3,674
You missed the other synonym, gouging
I don't think you know what price gouging is. We're not talking about doubling or tripling gas or water prices after a natural disaster, we're talking about charging a few more dollars to see teams that people actually want to see. I'm a Flyers fan and even I can see why it would be more expensive to see a Flyers v Pens game compared to a Flyers v Coyotes game. I'm not sure if you're a golfer but have you ever gone at noon on a Saturday and then again at 4pm on a Tuesday? Were the prices the same? Every try to book a flight to a big city a few days before departure? I bet you paid a different price than the guy sitting next to you that reserved it months in advance.
 

SnuggaRUDE

Registered User
Apr 5, 2013
9,069
6,620
You've never purchased something only to have it go "on sale". Same thing.

You know most retailers price match for this exact reason? Retail would be exhibit A for caveat emptor not being the operative strategy. You'd be hard pressed to find a US mass retailer with an all sales are final strategy.
 

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
51,881
14,845
You know most retailers price match for this exact reason? Retail would be exhibit A for caveat emptor not being the operative strategy. You'd be hard pressed to find a US mass retailer with an all sales are final strategy.
There is still a time limit for the price match. That is also for industries where the product is exactly the same. Sports is more of a service type of entertainment, same with a golf course, air travel, other entertainment. The product of a hockey game is different depending on the opponent, day of the week, and other conditions. It's comparing apples and oranges because they are completely different industries.
 

SnuggaRUDE

Registered User
Apr 5, 2013
9,069
6,620
There is still a time limit for the price match. That is also for industries where the product is exactly the same. Sports is more of a service type of entertainment, same with a golf course, air travel, other entertainment. The product of a hockey game is different depending on the opponent, day of the week, and other conditions. It's comparing apples and oranges because they are completely different industries.

No doubt, but quoted poster assured me that cavaet emptor was the rule of the day in all industries. It's demonstratively not.
 

StoneHands

Registered User
Feb 26, 2013
6,608
3,674
No doubt, but quoted poster assured me that cavaet emptor was the rule of the day in all industries. It's demonstratively not.
Actually he just said "it happens in every industry", not that it's the only way companies do business. He's not wrong. If an NHL team drops it's prices as a game approaches because they aren't sold out, it's because they are trying to get people through the door so they can make additional revenue from parking, concessions, etc. To expect that they would reimburse everyone else is silly. If that was what they had to do they simply wouldn't decrease the ticket prices for remaining seats rather than reimburse the thousands of people who already have tickets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: triggrman

SnuggaRUDE

Registered User
Apr 5, 2013
9,069
6,620
Actually he just said "it happens in every industry", not that it's the only way companies do business. He's not wrong. If an NHL team drops it's prices as a game approaches because they aren't sold out, it's because they are trying to get people through the door so they can make additional revenue from parking, concessions, etc. To expect that they would reimburse everyone else is silly. If that was what they had to do they simply wouldn't decrease the ticket prices for remaining seats rather than reimburse the thousands of people who already have tickets.

I'm not against price discrimination. It's generally not good for the consumer, but when transparent it's ethical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: triggrman

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
51,881
14,845
You know, they're not lowering the price on the any of the games, they just use it as justification to raise the prices on the "premium" games.
Yes and no. It really depends on the team. The Cardinals in baseball do a very good job of it. You can get all-inclusive seats on the non-premier teams/dates for $100 or less, and it's legitimately good food, not just the concession stand or simple stuff. You tend to see it work better in sports like baseball where there isn't a high likelihood of a sellout for the lower tier games. For smaller stadium sports or sports with less games, it's more likely that they can fill the arena without lowering prices much.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad