And how did that work out for him?On a short term deal. Similar to what San Jose did with Kevin Labanc.
Strome qualifying offer is nothing. He doesn't have much leverage, plus the flat cap. It's going to be a cheap re-sign.And how did that work out for him?
Gaudreau + Ryan for Stome ÷ Debrincat
What would the Hawks want from the Wild for Dylan Strome?
I think Kane could actually do wonders for Johnny's career and push his game to the next level. Lindholm is probably off the table, barring gross overpayment. Hanifin could be had but we'd need a young RD coming back, possibly as a part of a bigger package.Hawks pass. Don’t really want Gaudreau and especially don’t want to trade DeBrincat to get him, let alone trade Strome for Ryan. Hawks would be much more interested in Lindholm and Hanifin.
I think Kane could actually do wonders for Johnny's career and push his game to the next level. Lindholm is probably off the table, barring gross overpayment. Hanifin could be had but we'd need a young RD coming back, possibly as a part of a bigger package.
Beaudin doesn't really do much for us, we already have a plethora of LD prospects, at that level or better. I would want Mitchell, especially being an Alberta boy. It might be the homer in me, but I value Hanifin slightly over Strome to begin with, so I think its a fairly reasonable offer, with Bennett going the other way.Don’t blame you on Lindholm. Guy’s a really good player. As for a RD, not sure what we could give up. Our two top young RD (Boqvist and Mitchell) would be off the table most likely. We do have Beaudin, who plays LD and has top-4 potential. Maybe something around Strome and Beaudin for Hanifin and Bennett? Just spitballing.
Beaudin doesn't really do much for us, we already have a plethora of LD prospects, at that level or better. I would want Mitchell, especially being an Alberta boy. It might be the homer in me, but I value Hanifin slightly over Strome to begin with, so I think its a fairly reasonable offer, with Bennett going the other way.
Hanifin for Strome + Regula?
Honestly, probably not. I feel thats fair, maybe even favorable for the Hawks. Trades seldom work out when you give up the best player in a deal. The only reason I'd consider it is because it fills a team need. I may consider chipping in a 4th or 5th if its a deal breaker but not much other than that.I wouldn’t do Mitchell as we’re very high on him, but Strome and Regula, I’d think long and hard about. Not sure I do it though. I agree that one for one, Strome for Hanifin favors us. I don’t know the Flames’ forward prospects that well other than Pelletier. Is there a decent but not great forward prospect you could add to balance that? Like a top-9 prospect rather than a top-6 prospect.
Strome + Regula for Hanifin + ???
Honestly, probably not. I feel thats fair, maybe even favorable for the Hawks. Trades seldom work out when you give up the best player in a deal. The only reason I'd consider it is because it fills a team need. I may consider chipping in a 4th or 5th if its a deal breaker but not much other than that.