I don't think Clark has any explaining to do, especially considering his fairly solid drafting record other than this pick.
The league and the Rangers were in a very different place in 2010. It happens
One thing I'll continue to believe until proven otherwise is the Rangers and AV didn't ruin McIlrath. The evolution of the league season after season towards speed and skill did. He's a throwback player in a league that is not going backwards anytime soon. If he hooks on with another team and earns a regular spot, I'll happily concede that view.
But check out the NY Post article this morning. There's speculation that McIlrath can be had for something like a 3rd rounder. Wouldn't gorton's phone be ringing off the hook if other teams saw that type of value in McIlrath that many see on this board?
i disagree however i do concur that his game is no longer relevant in the new nhl.
drafting 101 is not drafting for a specific need. period.
you draft BPA everytime and realize that the best player has the best chance of playing in the league based upon his skills. you make room for talent. you develop talent and if there isn't room, you move that talent for more talent. its drafting 101. at the time of the 2010 draft, mcilraths skills were suspect.
things change ill give you that. coaches, systems, the league itself, all moving targets but skill trumps a perceived need. and in this case, even though torts may have had a hand in taking the physical toughness that was so intoxicating with dylan, the fact remains, he was a reach and a project from day 1 with such a limited resume as a hockey player.
keep in mind, he had NOT been playing competitive hockey that long, and certainly not at a high level compare to his peers in that draft. he was VERY raw and had really one small run of improvement prior to his draft year. his overall body of work was either incomplete or rather bland. the top highlight in his draft year was the fight against petrovic in the top prospects game. foreshadowing his future perhaps ?
he was a purely speculative pick based upon his size and ability to fight as his hockey skills were both underdeveloped and underwhelming at the time of the draft.
i totally reject the notion that "at the time we needed what he offered" argument for 2 reasons.
first, even if true and we were lacking toughness, he was 2-4 years away from helping anyway so that criteria for the pick was flawed- as it always will be when you draft for need. he wasnt nearly nhl ready to help soon enough so the idea that he was drafted to make us tougher assumed we would still need that 2-4 years later. flawed logic.
secondly, the things he offered to the team- when ever he was "ready" were skills that the league was phasing out in leu of a faster more skills based scoring game. dylan only offered those things the league no longer desired and struggles to this day with the new nhl pace of the game and ability to defend fast skilled players. those "hockey skills" he lacked on draft day continue to haunt him.
I've said many times before, when a player does his best work after the whistle or while standing static, thats not a skills based player and certainly not the 10th pick in the draft. fighting is a part of the game- and i hope it continues to be, but it cannot be the largest part of YOUR game in todays nhl.
this organization took a chance, gordie clark specifically took a chance, reaching for a raw project dman while there were better choices falling in their laps.
i hope he can catch on with another organization. he's gotten a raw deal form av for sure but we must understand av sees him in practice and in drills and our own forwards play against him daily so theres more info available to him to make his decisions. i dont think its just personal.
but, in the end, he will never be worthy of having been chosen the 10th pick in the 2010 draft.