Yes.Is this game as one sided as the shots indicate?
If there is an answer that's better than yes, that would be itIs this game as one sided as the shots indicate?
There have been some good individual performances, but the team was largely a mess up front.Is this game as one sided as the shots indicate?
Yeah, I feel like it was good D and a great goalie, but no one up front to capitalize on how well they were playing. Aberg came pretty close, though. Maybe we should trade for an enforcer to fix the team.Yikes, that stings.
We weren't generating much, but I don't feel like the ice was as tilted as the shot count indicates. Lots of one and done chances by the Canes.
Yeah, I feel like it was good D and a great goalie, but no one up front to capitalize on how well they were playing. Aberg came pretty close, though. Maybe we should trade for an enforcer to fix the team.
Aberg is dangerous when he just goes for the individual effort. This system produces zero offense.Yeah, I feel like it was good D and a great goalie, but no one up front to capitalize on how well they were playing. Aberg came pretty close, though. Maybe we should trade for an enforcer to fix the team.
Or sell the farm for Nylander and see how well he can cycle and grind down low.Yeah, I feel like it was good D and a great goalie, but no one up front to capitalize on how well they were playing. Aberg came pretty close, though. Maybe we should trade for an enforcer to fix the team.
The inability to gain the zone with even an effective dump-in is astonishing. Almost impressive.Aberg is dangerous when he just goes for the individual effort. This system produces zero offense.
Heusy_79 already came up with "Randemonium".Need new adjectives to describe how we played.