Proposal: DUCKS send one of [Larsson/Lindholm/Fowler/Mahura] to MTL

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
40,401
35,735
We do, and you have 4 amazing D on the LHD..

Poehling and suzuki are seen as #2 with a #1 ceiling
Maybe if we had Pettersson still, we could move 1 of the guys listed(not Lindholm).

But after the pettersson trade we have Lindholm-fowler-Larsson-Mahura… if 1 guy gets injured the 4th guy is pretty important... maybe if we take a LD in the 1st round this year. I like Mahura/Larsson a lot tho… I think if I was to move any of our dmen it would be fowler, but he has a NTC im pretty sure.

Nothing against the players/prospects listed.... just don't think we can move anyone else this season after the pettersson trade unless its something that could help us this year.
 

Just Linda

Registered User
Feb 24, 2018
6,652
6,539
All this debate about prospects but Anaheim needs young roster players.

Drouin for Fowler+

Age being the value difference.
 

HockeyDBspecialist

Habs 2019 cup champ
Jan 30, 2018
6,000
3,386
Montreal
Maybe if we had Pettersson still, we could move 1 of the guys listed(not Lindholm).

But after the pettersson trade we have Lindholm-fowler-Larsson-Mahura… if 1 guy gets injured the 4th guy is pretty important... maybe if we take a LD in the 1st round this year. I like Mahura/Larsson a lot tho… I think if I was to move any of our dmen it would be fowler, but he has a NTC im pretty sure.

Nothing against the players/prospects listed.... just don't think we can move anyone else this season after the pettersson trade unless its something that could help us this year.

A pretty well concised text and good respond from a Ducks!

Do you see Mahura staying a third LHD ? it annoys me mostly because all your LHD have a #1 D ceiling but someone will end on the last pair.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
40,401
35,735
A pretty well concised text and good respond from a Ducks!

Do you see Mahura staying a third LHD ? it annoys me mostly because all your LHD have a #1 D ceiling but someone will end on the last pair.
Hm that's tough to say.... I think mahura has a pretty high upside.... but hell be kinda stuck behind Lindholm/Fowler for a pretty long while. So unless fowler/Lindholm is injured long term or 1 is moved mahura/Larsson will likely never get a chance to show how good they are.

I will say I like mahura more than I ever liked theodore/Montour as prospects. Larsson tends to get slept on on the boards(ducks/main/prospects) but I think hes going to be a very solid top 4 dmen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ForrestHabsGump

Exit Dose

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
29,203
3,336
Georgia
All this debate about prospects but Anaheim needs young roster players.

Drouin for Fowler+

Age being the value difference.
We aren't adding to Fowler to make a Drouin trade happen. Drouin has to do something other than just being a few years younger to make that happen.
 

Exit Dose

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
29,203
3,336
Georgia
Maybe if we had Pettersson still, we could move 1 of the guys listed(not Lindholm).

But after the pettersson trade we have Lindholm-fowler-Larsson-Mahura… if 1 guy gets injured the 4th guy is pretty important... maybe if we take a LD in the 1st round this year. I like Mahura/Larsson a lot tho… I think if I was to move any of our dmen it would be fowler, but he has a NTC im pretty sure.

Nothing against the players/prospects listed.... just don't think we can move anyone else this season after the pettersson trade unless its something that could help us this year.
Fowler's NTC is that he can give a list of teams that he won't accept a trade to. The number of teams that he can put on that list is small - something like 4 or 5, if memory serves.

To add to the discussion around trading our prospects, the expansion draft is the biggest reason why those young and cheap defenseman likely stay put in the short term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Getz2perry

Spazkat

Registered User
Feb 19, 2015
4,361
2,277
All this debate about prospects but Anaheim needs young roster players.

Drouin for Fowler+

Age being the value difference.
Age difference is more than offset by the positional value. D > W Especially a wing with a career high 53 points
 

HockeyDBspecialist

Habs 2019 cup champ
Jan 30, 2018
6,000
3,386
Montreal
Ducks are in the same position as the Habs, trying to make the playoffs. Can't imagine Ducks trading a good starting Dman for futures.

The thing with the Ducks is that they have 4 LHD who all have the ceilling to be on a first pair, so in the end one of the guy will play less minute on the last pair. I think it's a waste of talent and asset to have 4 amazing LHD and 1 is not going to play between Larsson/Mahura/Lindholm/fowler.

If Mahura can give you a future #2 center, why not ?
 

HockeyDBspecialist

Habs 2019 cup champ
Jan 30, 2018
6,000
3,386
Montreal
Well, it's well known on HF that all Leafs prospects are A or A+.
All other teams prospects are B+ at best. But they all have potential to become A+ in the 24 hours following a trade to Toronto.

Also, don't forget that they have one of the worst D squad in the entire league, but they are still trying to trade them every single day for top players

" I will trade you Gardiner + Liljegren + Dermott" for Pietrangelo"
 
  • Like
Reactions: powerstuck

CapnZin

Registered User
Jul 20, 2017
4,665
6,204
Sweden
So he's a grade a prospect.
Lol... in general terms he can be defined as an A, you’re not wrong.

Looking into a deeper analysis, he’s on that border. It’s hard because we don’t know what he’s like, production wise, or even play style, against tougher competition.

When drafted he wasn’t an A, or maybe he was, but I think to call Frost a nonexpendable piece that leads a core could be overzealous at this time.

I wouldn’t trade him st all, he seems to be a great prospect, but I think as a group we label without defining. You know what I mean? There are distinctions with differences.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
40,401
35,735
The thing with the Ducks is that they have 4 LHD who all have the ceilling to be on a first pair, so in the end one of the guy will play less minute on the last pair. I think it's a waste of talent and asset to have 4 amazing LHD and 1 is not going to play between Larsson/Mahura/Lindholm/fowler.

If Mahura can give you a future #2 center, why not ?
Larsson and mahura (and to a lesser extent Lindholm) have all played on the right side a bit. I think ideally our roster looks like
Lindholm Manson
Fowler Dotchin
Larsson Montour

Mahura as a call up for injurys, hes still young and raw.. no need to rush him up and if he starts to show some high lvl talent at the NHL level... then maybe we look to move fowler in the offseason. But mahura isn't exactly NHL ready yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ForrestHabsGump

Anaheim4ever

Registered User
Jun 15, 2017
8,880
5,456
Lindholm is not being traded, he's producing more offensively this year than Ekman-Larsson, he is the Ducks #1D man, plays the most minutes, is good in both ends of the ice, offensively he's playing his best hockey this season & last season was a career high in his points per game rate.

I'd be open to moving Fowler for the right trade. The team looks fine with Larsson/Manson 2nd pairing.
If Fowler were traded then eventually in the future Mahura becomes the teams 2nd pair LHD.
 

Sojourn

Registered User
Nov 1, 2006
50,523
9,377
Lindholm is not being traded, he's producing more offensively this year than Ekman-Larsson, he is the Ducks #1D man, plays the most minutes, is good in both ends of the ice, offensively he's playing his best hockey this season & last season was a career high in his points per game rate.

I'd be open to moving Fowler for the right trade. The team looks fine with Larsson/Manson 2nd pairing.
If Fowler were traded then eventually in the future Mahura becomes the teams 2nd pair LHD.

They look fine with Gibson carrying them.

It isn't the same thing at all.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad