mytduxfan*
Guest
This. Our PK, scoring chances and PP have been pretty bad ever since fowler came back not saying it's all because of him maybe by him coming back it messed with the chemistry that was formed.
Let me sit in my armored tank while you all get the pitch forks and torches out
PK = is bad because we're missing Horcoff and the numbers were bound to drop with the loss of Hagelin. No surprise there. We're still running at ~83%, which is top 10 in the league.
Scoring chances = no idea what you're talking about. We're scoring a tonne right now and Fowler has 5 assists in the last 2 games.
PP = We just got 3 PP goals last night. Fowler assisted on one of them and he got an assist the other night in CHI on a 4-on-4 play. Is he better than Lindholm in that role? I'm not sure. But he's not the problem with the PP, which is currently 12th in the league (problem? what problem?).
I'm more concerned with the fact that the defensive coverage has been appaling in three of the 5 games on the road trip than with catching the Kings. Not good, at all.
Agreed, but I think that has a lot more to do with Despres - Vatanen and Fowler - Bieksa lacking chemistry. I simply cannot understand why BB has decided not to put Fowler - Despres back together.... Oh.... it's because Bieksa is completely useless unless he's being handheld by our best guy and even then he's awful to watch. If there is one thing that is holding me back from saying this team can win the SC this year, it's Bieksa being in the line-up.