Hellcat
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2022
- 2,166
- 2,080
I'd be OK with Barbashev and/or Bertuzzi and hope Tampa doesn't do much.
Tampa wont do much , they dont have a lot of near time assets, they are value shopping.
Last edited:
I'd be OK with Barbashev and/or Bertuzzi and hope Tampa doesn't do much.
Problem is Kyle doesn't bluff. If he says this then I believe itTypical response from a GM, I would be shocked if they didn’t add significant players at this deadline
I only saw 1 of his recent games live in 2022 in Zona while on a quick getaway but I have seen him play maybe 50 games when he was younger and then in junior too .. and his stripes have not changed .. most fans on here don't even realize he has a cray mean streak in him they actually think he plays like Rielly LOL
You mean this Rielly?
Yes he is so soft...
That sounds like a prime Dubas candidateYep.. it's a well known secret his hip is f-ed up... he's going to need surgery in the off season.
The Leafs aren’t contenders.
You have to actually win a playoff round at the absolute minimum to be considered one.
James and Brady no questions star athletes and in the GOAT conversation but I don't care for them at all. In my opinion them running the show in some sense is only to make them look better. I don't like it. Job is to perform on the field or court or ice. Leave the managing to management. For this reason and their arrogance when both are gone make my day. 1 gone(supposedly) 1 more to go.Nope but special people get special rules, that is how life works. Elite athletes in every sport have varying degrees of say in how their roster is built. James in basketball, Brady in football, I'm sure McDavid has some influence. Austin and Mitch are rumored to have a level of influence with Dubas and Shanahan. Not many coaches fly half way around the the continent, on their own time, to talk with their players. I'm sure Keefe is not flying to Kampft's home this summer to "talk"
Other teams strengthen we sit idle. Oh don't worry Dubas will improve the team like he has last few years. NOT.I would’ve loved Tarasenko on this team. Our top 6 is so unbalanced when Mathew’s is out. He’d be an upgrade we could use.
I know that the deadline is still weeks away, but with the Tarasenko trade today it has me a little worried Dubas sitting on his hands while legitimate proven stars are being sent to other contenders.
The Rangers are in the Leafs conference.
They already have a strong team. Panarin and Zibanejad are superstar forwards. Fox just won a Norris two years ago. And Shesterkin just took home the Vezina.
Dubas has put himself in a damned if you don't, damned if you don't situation, of his own making.
There's not a lot of assets left in the system anyway, may as well go all in.
Yeah, I’m not too concerned with what teams other than Tampa and Boston do, tbh.I'm guessing Dubas is focusing on beating Tampa and getting his extension. Anything past that is gravy.
No, it hasn't. It also has nothing to do with this year.Yes. And it's never been the Leafs in the last 6 years
Well, not making it past the first round eliminates a team from being a contender by the sole criterion by the poster mikeyz. It doesn't elimiinate me from anything, nor does it represent my view of what teams are or are not considered contenders.In the first round you really only have 1 of 2 options, you win a round or you go home. If you go home and I'm no NHL rules scholar but I'm pretty sure that eliminates you from the contender category
You were probably saying that 5 previous times. And how did those years turn out?No, it hasn't. It also has nothing to do with this year.
So you're saying that just because a team gets eliminated in the 1st round 6 consecutive years doesn't mean they're not contenders?Well, not making it past the first round eliminates a team from being a contender by the sole criterion by the poster mikeyz. It doesn't elimiinate me from anything, nor does it represent my view of what teams are or are not considered contenders.
It is simple math if they have been eliminated in the first round for six straight year- that would include the last 5 years of them being eliminated in the first round. That is how they turned out.You were probably saying that 5 previous times. And how did those years turn out?
So you're saying that just because you get eliminated in the 1st round 6 consecutive years doesn't mean you're not a contender?
You are very miserable and lack common sense. Sorry about thatYou were probably saying that 5 previous times. And how did those years turn out?
So you're saying that just because a team gets eliminated in the 1st round 6 consecutive years doesn't mean they're not contenders?
Yes. So what makes you think that this year is going to be any different when they've arguably gotten worse?It is simple math if they have been eliminated in the first round for six straight year- that would include the last 5 years of them being eliminated in the first round. That is how they turned out.
It is a different year. I have no idea if the Leafs will win a round or more this year or not. They haven't even secured a playoff spot yet, but what they have done the past year, 6 years , 20 years or even for the entire 107 years of the franchise has no barring on this year.Yes. So what makes you think that this year is going to be any different when they've arguably gotten worse?
No it doesn't have any barring. But, it can give you a pretty good idea of what will happen. And I haven't been wrong yet.It is a different year. I have no idea if the Leafs will win a round or more this year or not. They haven't even secured a playoff spot yet, but what they have done the past year, 6 years , 20 years or even for the entire 107 years of the franchise has no barring on this year.
So because I don't bring out the pom poms and wave them 24/7 like you do, that means I don't have common sense?You are very miserable and lack common sense. Sorry about that
Sure, a 50% chance.No it doesn't have any barring. But, it can give you a pretty good idea of what will happen.
Sure, a 50% chance.
I wouldn't say it's 50/50Sure, a 50% chance.
Either they will win in the first round or they won't.I wouldn't say it's 50/50
Maybe 80/20 And even that's being generous.