zzoo
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2004
- 3,116
- 187
Usually, I hate the idea of dressing 7D in a game. We weren't very successful with that strategy.
However, now the more I think about it, the more I like it. It allows us to roll three good offensive lines. We could double-shift Pac and Galchenyuk on the 3rd line with Eller. With Pac or Galchenyuk on that line, it becomes much more dangerous.
x - Eller - Sekac
Prust - Maholtra - Weise
Prust and Weise can sometimes play on the 3rd line too. Maholtra will play only on PK and when we need to win an important face-off.
As for the defense, if we need a goal, we can play Beaulieu with Gonchar (of course Markov with PK). When we need to protect a goal, we will play Weaver more often than Gonchar.
What do you think ?
However, now the more I think about it, the more I like it. It allows us to roll three good offensive lines. We could double-shift Pac and Galchenyuk on the 3rd line with Eller. With Pac or Galchenyuk on that line, it becomes much more dangerous.
x - Eller - Sekac
Prust - Maholtra - Weise
Prust and Weise can sometimes play on the 3rd line too. Maholtra will play only on PK and when we need to win an important face-off.
As for the defense, if we need a goal, we can play Beaulieu with Gonchar (of course Markov with PK). When we need to protect a goal, we will play Weaver more often than Gonchar.
What do you think ?