Good thing Laviolette isn't the GM, eh?
When you approach the trade dead line as we all know there are buyers and there are sellers. Buyers are motivated by the now, that is trying to improve their team for the immediate to make them better for the playoffs and a SC run. Sellers on the other hand are looking at the future, what could make them better perhaps as soon as next season or thereafter. So Rangers fans in the teams current position should be asking themselves who would make the team better now Dowd or Kakko. We are talking about today and the next few months, looking at the future of the two players and their age difference is a non factor in such an analysis.
I'm not supporting the original proposal, rather the one I would go with is Dowd (for what has already been stated about him), Pacioretty (who like Chris Drury is a Connecticut boy and though he has a NMC, he indicated that it'll be a geographical decision for him to waive it as he's indicated that his family is on the east coast, so most likely he would waive it for the Rangers). Caps would further offer to eat 50% of Dowd's contract and take Barclay Goodrow and his albatross contract back. But to do all of this the Capitals would get Kakko along with the Rangers 1st and 2nd round pick this year for taking on Goodrow's contract that we know Rangers and their fans would like to shed.
In essence:
Capitals Dowd and Pacioretty (resulting in about a 2.7 cap hit according to CF, centerman and forward) for Rangers Goodrow and Kakko (5.7 mil in cap according to CF), along with '24 1st and 2nd)
The 2024 draft does not look like a strong one and the likes of Jeff Marek and Elliot Friedman suggest that the quality of players drops significantly after the top 20. Most likely the Rangers first round pick will be 25 or later.