It appears he's showing guys what they can be instead of telling them what they are not.The Don sounds like a natural motivator.
It appears he's showing guys what they can be instead of telling them what they are not.
We've all probably had coaches throughout life try to motivate. Some simply come off as BS and others make you want to play for them. It is a two-way street. Players have to trust what they're hearing.It appears he's showing guys what they can be instead of telling them what they are not.
Yup. Im all for a center spine of Eichel/Reinhart/Mitts/Cozens, and filling out the wings via FA and trades, which should be more cost effective.Those Sam comments are amazing.
If Granato stays, we could actually see a Jack/Sam combo in the top 6. Something many of us have wanted to see for some time.
The possibilities on the wings would be exciting with all the youth and Skinner.
You're 100% right about sample size. History shows teams do get a burst of energy after firing a head coach. There is very little pressure. I mean we should all remember Ron Rolston.This thread pop up on the front page of the site and I wanna wish you guys well and hope the Sabres will push for a guy like Gallant or Boudreau. Granato has done wonderful but my God is it such a small sample size. I wouldn't hire a guy based on that alone.
But again, all the best. Hopefully I'll run into one of you guys outside Amalie Arena
Yeah, and it's obviously not as easy as "just tell guys to do what they're good at" .We've all probably had coaches throughout life try to motivate. Some simply come off as BS and others make you want to play for them. It is a two-way street. Players have to trust what they're hearing.
This thread pop up on the front page of the site and I wanna wish you guys well and hope the Sabres will push for a guy like Gallant or Boudreau. Granato has done wonderful but my God is it such a small sample size. I wouldn't hire a guy based on that alone.
But again, all the best. Hopefully I'll run into one of you guys outside Amalie Arena
Does anyone remember the consensus on rolston at the time?You're 100% right about sample size. History shows teams do get a burst of energy after firing a head coach. There is very little pressure. I mean we should all remember Ron Rolston.
So yeah if we can land a top guy then do it, Bruce Boudreau would be great. However if the young players continue to respond to Granato then there are many reasons to move forward with him.
Granato's work on the ice, is only a fraction of the work he has done off the ice.
He deserves the job. He has the resume. Gallant and Boudreau both have way more recent issues than Granato. With the crap fans just went through with Krueger and his personality, I want nothing to do with the headstrong Gallant.
You're 100% right about sample size. History shows teams do get a burst of energy after firing a head coach. There is very little pressure. I mean we should all remember Ron Rolston.
So yeah if we can land a top guy then do it, Bruce Boudreau would be great. However if the young players continue to respond to Granato then there are many reasons to move forward with him.
View attachment 424527
@TheMistyStranger
Overall shot attempts and scoring chances in favor of his play under Don.
Certainly some help from shooting % and save % while he's on ice impacting the overall goals too.
The high danger goals for and against are something that interest me. I think it's difficult to determine how much of that difference is luck, granato vs ralph, Giarardi vs Smith, or goaltending.
Edit:
I hate to pile on to a guy that lost his job, when we don't know to what extent he was at fault, but it seems Adams deserves some kudos for deciding that Granato was staying and that Steve Smith was going out with Ralph
One of the things that has been on my mind is how bad the analytics still look, but watching the Sabres it 'feels' like there is serious improvement.
I took a closer look and noticed that we are allowing a serious amount of low danger shots recently, the table below is sorted by LDSA/60:
View attachment 424552
We lead the league by far in this category. I wonder if the opposition scouting report is stressing shooting from everywhere as much as possible, based on our goalies and their performance to date. This high volume shot strategy would drive the corsi and even the xG metrics down, but also explain why the Sabres seem more dangerous lately.
They’re also keeping it simple in our end. Not chasing and focused on protecting the middle. They will frequently conceded the outside. Which contributes to opposing teams shooting from there a lot. Plus the goalies as you mentioned. As an example, after Pitt scored that funky angle shot on Tokarski, they kept shooting from similar funky angles on him.One of the things that has been on my mind is how bad the analytics still look, but watching the Sabres it 'feels' like there is serious improvement.
I took a closer look and noticed that we are allowing a serious amount of low danger shots recently, the table below is sorted by LDSA/60:
View attachment 424552
We lead the league by far in this category. I wonder if the opposition scouting report is stressing shooting from everywhere as much as possible, based on our goalies and their performance to date. This high volume shot strategy would drive the corsi and even the xG metrics down, but also explain why the Sabres seem more dangerous lately.
That "meatball" - moniker, though...
I understand, it's because of his Italian last name?
I've heard cleverer nicknames, if that's the case...
Reminds of that Kramer bit, where he forces Seinfeld to look at his chesthair“look. f***ing look at what everyone else is doing, now watch what happens when I put this dude in. Doesn’t work, see? So I’m gonna bench him next game, cool? Cool.”
Still, the scoring chances against haven't really decreased. I don't believe the low danger attempts against are replacing quality ones, but adding to themThey’re also keeping it simple in our end. Not chasing and focused on protecting the middle. They will frequently conceded the outside. Which contributes to opposing teams shooting from there a lot. Plus the goalies as you mentioned. As an example, after Pitt scored that funky angle shot on Tokarski, they kept shooting from similar funky angles on him.
Still, the scoring chances against haven't really decreased. I don't believe the low danger attempts against are replacing quality ones, but adding to them
Of course, we know that all scoring chances aren't created equal, so they might be similar on paper and different in reality. But at this point it doesn't seem we're limiting the "dangerous" attempts against as defined by the stat, in terms of volume at least