Still better than if she would say that it's bigger than your friends have)I asked my wife and she said "No, that's why i married you."
What the heck does that mean!?!?
Is it possible to be happy and sad at same time? Yes, when your wife tells you that you were the biggest out of ALL of your friends.I asked my wife and she said "No, that's why i married you."
What the heck does that mean!?!?
Is it possible to be happy and sad at same time? Yes, when your wife tells you that you were the biggest out of ALL of your friends.
Thats true.Still better than if she would say that it's bigger than your friends have)
I think there is only sadness there.Is it possible to be happy and sad at same time? Yes, when your wife tells you that you were the biggest out of ALL of your friends.
Thats true.
I think there is only sadness there.
Dropping the knowledge on me tonight. Good stuff.No brother, screw sadness, disappointment maybe, but life is too short to cry for people who don't want you.
Dropping the knowledge on me tonight. Good stuff.
What are you talking about? There are a tonne of small players around the league that have solidified their place on their respective NHL rosters despite their size. Definetly more than a 'handful'.
DeBrincat was one of two guys on an NHL roster this year under 5-8. There’s another handful of guys 5-8, less than 10. Considering we’ve got 31 rosters of 23 each, that’s a handful. Very very far from a ton.
Five of the top ten players in points the last season are under 6 feet. The other 5 are hovering right around it.
You've got plenty of smaller guys other than DeBrincat. Gaudreau, Marchand, Marchessault...
DeBrincat was one of two guys on an NHL roster this year under 5-8. There’s another handful of guys 5-8, less than 10. Considering we’ve got 31 rosters of 23 each, that’s a handful. Very very far from a ton.
There's a big difference between being 5'11" (only slightly below NHL average for a forward) and being 5'7" (which, I believe, is a height shared by only 2 NHL players). You can't just lump them all in one "shorter than 6'" bundle and draw conclusions from that.
Difference between Kane, Crosby, Marchand, DeBrincat, Marchessault, is almost nothing.
The average NHLer is 6'1". So looking at it below and above 6 feet makes sense to me.
I don't think the colloquial usage of the term "short" is anything like that. Just like someone in the 49.9th percentile isn't "stupid" and someone in the 51st percentile isn't "smart". People in the 25th-75th percentile are usually considered average, slightly above average, or slightly below average. A 6 footer isn't tall, and a 5'11.75" person isn't short.Difference between Kane, Crosby, Marchand, DeBrincat, Marchessault, is almost nothing.
The average NHLer is 6'1". So looking at it below and above 6 feet makes sense to me.
Yes. Gaudreau is a good example, good in the regular season but in the playoffs with the big trucks coming to hit him he fizzles out because he's afraid to get hurt due to his small stature, and him being afraid to get hit hurts his offensive game.
So size does have it's impacts.
In some instances there are small guys who aren't scared of getting hurt or can adapt their game to still be effective while under threat of being hit.Sounds like a Gaudreau thing, not a size thing. Danny Briere never had much of a problem in the playoffs, and despite his listed height, he's like 5'6".