Not sure how this unfolds, but one of the options of moving Andersen with no cash coming back got removed yesterday. I guess we could still move him for 2021 picks as a means of not taking cap back.
To me, it looks more and more like we keep Andersen. That kind of return is meh, especially when you add in the risk factor with a replacement, I suspect we go with the “devil we know”. I get not having confidence Andersen can get us there, he probably walks, but man Dubas puts his ass on the line if he gets the crease wrong. There has to be enormous trepidation here.
There's still a decent batch of free agent tenders after Holtby & Markstrom.And another opened up with New Jersey buying out Corey Schneider.
Me thinks some of the dominoes may fall after Braden Holtby/Jakob Markstrom sign and at what price. Because after those two, the remaining FA goalies are either question marks or have really short shelf lives.
There's still a decent batch of free agent tenders after Holtby & Markstrom.
Crawford, Smith, Khudobin, Greiss, Georgiev, Dell, Lundqvist, Talbot. Arizona & Columbus wants to move one of their tenders. That's 12, so seems like the supply side could be bigger than demand - idk? I'm thinking some will end up with short duration contracts as well given flat cap & market conditions, so there could be some competition for Freddie in the short, stop gap solution area as well.
Oh, that's definitely a feature or advantage for looking at Freddie.One big difference. Andersen is only owed $1M for this year ($5M cap hit). That's a big deal for those looking to increase cap while keeping costs down (on say, a team needing to hit the basement value).
A one year rental at that price for a goalie that good, has to be ideal for any stop-gap situation. 1 year removed from an All-Star appearance.
To me, it looks more and more like we keep Andersen. That kind of return is meh, especially when you add in the risk factor with a replacement, I suspect we go with the “devil we know”. I get not having confidence Andersen can get us there, he probably walks, but man Dubas puts his ass on the line if he gets the crease wrong. There has to be enormous trepidation here.
That’s insane to think you can hand the reigns to Campbell. I like Campbell, but good lord what a gamble.Keeping Anderson falls into that category, keeping Anderson is wrong. Anderson falters during pressure and has proven that too many times, then look at his body language, head down, slumped over, looks rattled and upset. Campbell taking over #1 over Anderson at the very least must happen. The 3.5 million dollar gap between Campbell and Anderson isnt that noticeable from my stance vs spending that on defense.
haha he grew up in Thunder Bay, thats normal!Just partially joking here but doesn’t Matt Murray look like one of the oldest 20 somethings out there?
...... when is the last time he played hockey?Ian Scott is the real deal.
You call Moore a 4th liner, but Clifford a "fringe NHLer"? Clifford has played more than 10 times the NHL games that Moore has.So a 4th liner, (2) thirds for a back up goalie and a fringe NHLer.
A 2nd rounder /prospect for a 1A goalie
Who got the better deal?
It's not even up for debate that Dubas got a much better deal.You call Moore a 4th liner, but Clifford a "fringe NHLer"? Clifford has played more than 10 times the NHL games that Moore has.
Murray was coming off a horrible year, and was an RFA with arbitration rights that was scaring off everybody. Campbell wasn't really that much lower in quality, and was signed for 2 and a half years at a great price.
Dubas got the better deal.
Same with Murray then. So cap dumps get a 2nd and a prospect.
He's not someone who has value to a Detroit. He's someone who has value to a budget team who doesn't care about cap hits, and wants a starting goalie for $1 million.I dont think anyone gives the Leafs a 2nd and a prospect for Anderson. Murray had a bad year last year, but he does have 2 cups. The reputation on Anderson around the league is that he chokes in big games, and hes never even won a playoff round.
I'm a Wings fan, but I do like the Leafs as I grew up watching both. From my Wings perspective, I wouldnt be happy with the Wings giving up anything for Anderson, I'd only take him if it was a cap dump and we acquired assets to take him off your hands.
He's not someone who has value to a Detroit. He's someone who has value to a budget team who doesn't care about cap hits, and wants a starting goalie for $1 million.
His salary is $1 million for this season. Not $5 million. Please do your research.What team team do you believe would give up a 2nd round pick for a 5mil caphit & 5 mil expense (what is salary is) for a goalie who is is being criticized by his own fan base for choking in the playoffs and is a 31 year old upcoming UFA. Maybe I'm wrong, but I dont think there is a chance in hell the Leafs get a 2nd for him unless a team is desperate once the season starts due to an injury.
Look at Chicago for example, Vegas has already said they would trade MAF with a 2nd AND retain half his cap (ie. making him about 3.5mil), so if a team like Chicago wanted a goalie, why would they give up a second to Toronto, when they could have a better goalie and gain assets?
Andersen makes 1 mil in salary this year, and is a much better goalie than Fleury.What team team do you believe would give up a 2nd round pick for a 5mil caphit & 5 mil expense (what is salary is) for a goalie who is is being criticized by his own fan base for choking in the playoffs and is a 31 year old upcoming UFA. Maybe I'm wrong, but I dont think there is a chance in hell the Leafs get a 2nd for him unless a team is desperate once the season starts due to an injury.
Look at Chicago for example, Vegas has already said they would trade MAF with a 2nd AND retain half his cap (ie. making him about 3.5mil), so if a team like Chicago wanted a goalie, why would they give up a second to Toronto, when they could have a better goalie and gain assets?