At this point you may be right. When I thought of Vinnie possibly scoring 70ish points for the club for the next four years I was quite excited. It was looking like getting Sundin back, except with a supporting cast. When I think about Weiss or Grabo possibly getting 60ish points, or Boz getting 50 in the number one hole, the club just doesn't look like they are one player away from a run.
I like Stastny as a #1 more than Boz/Grabs/Weiss but he costs assets and a big salary, and is upcoming FA plus he has to turn back the clock a couple of years. And he is my GOOD option
Clarkson I like but you always pay too much for FAs (except Vinnie) and what if he wants 5 years? And aren't their D really shakier than their forwards anyway? Wouldn't they be better off just keying on a single weakness, like top pairing D, and waiting a year to take a run? They have no people that are going to get worse in the next year except for maybe Lupul because he keeps getting hurt so they have some time.
But then you look at Philly and Dallas who are 20th place clubs chasing veteran FAs. Maybe the way really is to try to do it evey year, once you have most of the building blocks.
I don't see an obvious silver bullet to their #1 c issue. The Vinnie almost (if they were even seriopusly in on it) reminded me what it is like when they actually have a chance to properly fill a hole with an excellent candidate (big, strong, playmakiing point producer) rather than stopgaps. They missed the excellent candidate. Maybe they need to wait for another excellent fix and not spend money on band aids. The club may not want to take their foot off the pedal though I don't think it would bother me much if they did.