Did Ovechkin become close to what Lindros was supposed to be ?

Discussion in 'The History of Hockey' started by Conn Tavares, Dec 31, 2018.

  1. streitz

    streitz Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2018
    Messages:
    1,258
    Likes Received:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    66

    That's true but he was a better goalscorer.
     
  2. senior edler

    senior edler your alternate captain

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    8,246
    Likes Received:
    2,445
    Trophy Points:
    126
    If Lindros put all his focus on goal scoring, like Neely did, backed up by Bourque and Oates, I think the difference would have been quite miniscule between them. The other way around, Neely as a playmaker, is a harder cookie to sell.
     
    ted2019 likes this.
  3. GoGoSens

    GoGoSens Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2017
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    92
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Gender:
    Male
    lol he's no where nearly as physical as Lindros.

    Lindros was mean, nasty could end a career with a clean hit, he also had elite offensive skill.

    He single handly took his phillies team to the finals.

    I would take a healthy Lindros over any center in the league today if it meant I could have him in his prime right now.

    He would wreck this league and could dominate a game more than even McDavid can.
     
    mobilus and 66Lemieux like this.
  4. BigBadBruins7708

    BigBadBruins7708 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2017
    Messages:
    6,031
    Likes Received:
    6,220
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Location:
    East Providence, RI
    as I pointed out in the Neely thread, this is false.

    Neely was Neely long before Oates.

    -He scored 55 and 51 pre Oates
    -He had his 4 dominant playoff runs, including 2 Finals appearances pre Oates
    -He never played anything close to a full season with Oates playing only 162 games over 5 seasons
    -Even when he did play with Oates, he was not 100%
    -The only season he was classic Neely with Oates was the 50 in 44, and even then he only played 49 games that year

    To your playmaker point, I can counter with linemates. Who's to say Neely isnt a better playmaker with a LeClair next to him. No offense to them but Carpenter, Brickley, Janney are not near the class of LeClair.

    Lindros v Neely comes down to what you value more, IMO.

    You choose Neely if you want the better goal scorer, better hitter and better fighter
    You choose Lindros if you want the better overall offensive player and (slightly) better player
     
  5. The Macho Man

    The Macho Man Lusty Bodychecker

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2011
    Messages:
    39,418
    Likes Received:
    13,930
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Ovi can lay some big hits, but I never thought of him as a "power forward" like I do when I think of Lindros.
     
  6. popo

    popo Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Messier was the best historical Lindros comparison. That was the name everyone cited as a comparable for Lindros hype when he was being drafted and coming into the league.
    The difference was Lindros was a super sized Messier. That difference was profound enough to make it that Lindros was a unique player in history.

    Similarly I can't think of a lot of guys like Ovechkin - his longevity, goal scoring prowess, size and speed, and enthusiasm. Coming into the league I thought he was like Kovalchuk - big Russian, right shooting LW, with speed and primarily a shooter.
     
    feffan likes this.
  7. senior edler

    senior edler your alternate captain

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    8,246
    Likes Received:
    2,445
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Janney was a near elite playmaker himself.
     
    Tarantula likes this.
  8. Cursed Lemon

    Cursed Lemon Registered Bruiser

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    8,740
    Likes Received:
    972
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dey-Twah, MI
    See, if people don't want compare Ovechkin to Lindros, I don't think you can compare Lindros to Messier. Messier was basically Howe 2.0 in the physical department. I don't think anyone ever really played crash-and-bang to the borderline insane level that Lindros did, and where Howe and Messier's longevity is incredible, Lindros' short career speaks for itself there.
     
  9. psycat

    psycat Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    305
    Trophy Points:
    79
    Location:
    Linkoping Sweden
    Might be true but peak Ovi >>> McDavid
     
    Hippasus likes this.
  10. Lukin1978

    Lukin1978 Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    951
    Likes Received:
    904
    Trophy Points:
    119
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Calgary
    Yeah I’ve never seen a combination like prime Lindros
     
  11. Hanji

    Hanji Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    381
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Was Lindros ever healthy for a prolonged period of time?
    I recall Lindros as exceedingly injury prone; and that's excluding the concussions.

    Yes he would wreck today's league until he'd inevitably be knocked unconscious with his head down; history repeated.
    Bull in a china shop = playing with fire. Dominant but unsustainable.
     
  12. Conn Tavares

    Conn Tavares “The Leafs are mulch again”

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,297
    Likes Received:
    1,873
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    HFX
    Lots of good points.

    No doubt Lindros was meaner & was an unparalled physical force when he first came into the league. A runaway for Lindros with the fighting sure, but its been slowly phased out of the league during Ovie's time anyway. I doubt the Capitals ever wanted him to fight even if he wanted to. I guess the real point was can you think of anyone comparable besides Ovechkin to Lindros that you would expect to contend for the Hart & Art Ross but also has this side to his game:

     
  13. streitz

    streitz Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2018
    Messages:
    1,258
    Likes Received:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    66


    Neely had plenty of good goal scoring seasons with Linseman and Jannry who were far inferior to Leclair/Recchi.
     
  14. The Panther

    The Panther Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    10,034
    Likes Received:
    3,516
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    I would say Janney was much the better playmaker than Recchi, and obviously Leclair.

    Lindros was a more multi-skilled offensive player than Neely. I agree that Neely was better at purely goal scoring than Lindros, but it's like saying Dennis Hull was better at goal scoring than Jean Beliveau.

    Not sure why we are talking about Neely...
     
  15. streitz

    streitz Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2018
    Messages:
    1,258
    Likes Received:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    66
    I agree with Lindros being more skilled then Neely


    The reason I brought him up was Benchbrawl mentioned no player having the package of skill and intimidation Lindros brought. I said Neely was close, I'd even say Neely was more physical.
     
  16. Merya

    Merya Jokerit & Finland; anti-theist

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,150
    Likes Received:
    326
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Occupation:
    Psychosocialstudies
    Location:
    Helsinki
    Yeah 20 game suspensions would let him try to train skating. Lindros was only an above average skater among peers. All of his strengths are outlawed and all of his handicaps are more important than ever.
    No Lindros would not have a significant role in NHL nowadays. His skillset is completely wrong for today.
     
  17. Filthy Dangles

    Filthy Dangles 1st man on the Forecheck and Backcheck

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2014
    Messages:
    16,833
    Likes Received:
    17,278
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Location:
    Ittoqqortoormiit
    Lindros' physical game was a lot more reckless and prevalent. Think Ovie's buddy and linemate, Tommy Wilson for a comparison physically. And obviously endowed and supplemented by near, if not generational type talent.
     
  18. ted2019

    ted2019 Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,391
    Likes Received:
    598
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    pittsgrove nj
    If Neely was the player you said he was, then how come he never got any attention for a Hart Trophy? The only vote he received was 9th in 93/94 when he scored 50 in 49 games. Also, Lindros doesn't get enough credit for playing in his own zone. The only time he was a minus player was the final 2 of his career, when he was done and even then, he was only a -3 & -1. Neely was a + 83 in his career (+137 in Boston), while Lindros was a +215 in his career (+ 183 in Philly). Lindros was also a dominant in faceoffs, as he averaged 55.91% for his career. Eric Lindros Stats and News
     
  19. streitz

    streitz Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2018
    Messages:
    1,258
    Likes Received:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    66
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  20. streitz

    streitz Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2018
    Messages:
    1,258
    Likes Received:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    66

    He'd still be a top player today. He had skill he wasn't just a bull in a china shop, if anything the less physical league today might help him since he wouldn't have to be worried about being killed by Stevens.
     
  21. Mike Farkas

    Mike Farkas Grace Personified

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    10,048
    Likes Received:
    3,013
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    PA
    Home Page:
    Yeah, not having to worry about head hits and a lot of d-men working to hold lines just with an active stick, Lindros would be a force today...
     
    Hippasus likes this.
  22. GoGoSens

    GoGoSens Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2017
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    92
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Gender:
    Male
    lol Peak Ovi does not own Mcdavid

    Mcdavid is not even at his peak and he already has 2 art ross trophies.

    And ovie never had the skill to take over a game like Mcdavid does, I have seen no one with this skill since Lindros.

    Mcdavid is the only reason the oiliers are not worse than they should be.
     
  23. Voight

    Voight #winning

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    23,485
    Likes Received:
    2,829
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    MACV-SOG
    except keep his head up
     
  24. Cursed Lemon

    Cursed Lemon Registered Bruiser

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    8,740
    Likes Received:
    972
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dey-Twah, MI
    What even is this sentence

    Lindros isn't the ultimate skill player and Ovi was absolutely that good early in his career.
     
  25. Filthy Dangles

    Filthy Dangles 1st man on the Forecheck and Backcheck

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2014
    Messages:
    16,833
    Likes Received:
    17,278
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Location:
    Ittoqqortoormiit
    Ovechkin's 2008 campaign was better than any season McDavid has had to date. And him from 05-2010 is probably at worst, equal to current McDavid.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"