Jim Bob
RIP RJ
Bovada sets Sabres over/under point total at 65.5. Isles at 83.5.
What about the other 28 teams? Or at least the teams in the bottom 5 to 10?
Bovada sets Sabres over/under point total at 65.5. Isles at 83.5.
http://sabres.buffalonews.com/2014/09/09/sabres-given-best-odds-finishing-last/What about the other 28 teams? Or at least the teams in the bottom 5 to 10?
I wonder how accurate they were last season, for example?
Florida can't be that bad again, can they?
I don't think so. I think they start putting it together this year... finally. I don't think they make the playoffs but definitely not bottom feeders.
I'll let you crunch the numbers, JB:
http://www.cbssports.com/nhl/eye-on...nder-point-totals-have-pens-first-flames-last
Let's just say they overestimated a touch with Buffalo's O/U of 83.5.
Lu is an upgrade to Thomas... team defense should improve...the #1 overall pick makes the team, and if someone like Seth Jones is any indication of what a top rookie dman of potentially elite caliber can mean to a unit right away, it should be a quantifiable plus for them.
Who scores goals for them besides Hubie? Sounds pretty similar...
The first thing to keep in mind about the Sabres of last season is that they were, in addition to being the worst team in the league, almost hopelessly unlucky. They only got to 52 points last season, which is pathetic (literally 40 points below league-average), despite the fact that Ryan Miller and the rest of the goalies stopped 5 percent more shots than the average NHL goaltending (.918); if they'd kept Miller the whole season, instead of wisely trading him, they'd have probably gotten closer to 60. He was that good for them.
But even 60 would have been bad, and the fact that they shed Miller and will instead rely upon Michal Neuvirth to push things along. Things will not go quite so well for them in the goaltending department as a consequence, but Neuvirth isn't bad or anything, and the rest of the team has improved. They brought in Brian Gionta and Andrej Meszaros among other NHL veterans, and re-signed Matt Moulson after trading him to Minnesota. Now that's asset management. The team's biggest problem was scoring, and it's not really been addressed, but the likelihood that an entire team shoots just 7 percent again (almost two points below league average) next season seems quite low.
So the question becomes whether that increase will square up with a potentially big drop in save percentage, and how adding some better players in front of Neuvirth will affect their shots-against total. One assumes that the answer is “not enough to make a differenceâ€, and so this will still be an almost-incredibly bad team, all things considered. I feel pretty confident saying that they weren't really as bad as a 52-point team last year, and they won't be that bad again this time around. They are, however, clearly still downright awful.
It'll be interesting to see if the luck actually goes their way this season, too, and effectively screws them into a race with some other teams for dead last. It's not probable, but it's certainly possible, that such a thing could happen, especially if one of the other deeply bad teams ends up getting the same kind of tough bounces Buffalo did last year.
But because the rules for the draft lottery have been changed to take away some of the advantage of finishing 30th — a hearty screw-you to the tanking crowd from the league — it's also fair to examine the group of teams that might come next, and I'd say there are probably only two or three who have a legit shot at finishing 29th. And by the way, it goes without saying that even if you're picking second in the draft come June, you're still walking away with a very good player in Jack Eichel, whom most scouts said would have been No. 1 overall in this past draft, had he been eligible.
I think this idea that the young guys are forcing our hands here is kind of disingenuous. Didn't we all want and foresee these players developing well? Nobody's having a star campaign here, girgensons is having a 50 point pace right now and ristolainen and zadorov are playing reliable top 4 minutes. It was always pretty obvious that if you wanted to stay in the basement while having 3-4 players develop smartly, you needed to add a bevy of liabilities to the roster to offset their talent. We just haven't done that. I think it was firmly in our power. For better or worse, Tim Murray owns the outcome of this process.
I think this idea that the young guys are forcing our hands here is kind of disingenuous. Didn't we all want and foresee these players developing well?
What are you talking about, the development blueprint headed into this season was always Girgensons at first line center and breaking Z/R in as 20+ minute all situations players. On a team coachdd by Ted(s) Nolan (s).Talk about disingenuous