Age/experience thing. Tedenby is no longer immune from waivers, so the absence of a two-way contract is sort of irrelevant.
1-way and 2-way deals both deal with waivers, it's an age thing IIRC?
Interesting, I wonder how long a player can be exempt from waivers.Waivers is a age/experience thing.
1 way and 2 contracts have to do with money.
2 way deal there is a different money amount for playing in the ahl.
One way u get paid the same in both leagues
Hope he plays well.
If he gets sent down, he will definitely be snagged by someone on waivers since he's on a 1 way contract.
I still havent given up on thiskid23 year old.
Admittedly, he's no longer a fetus, so you cant use that excuse anymore, but he is young and seemingly moronically stubborn. If Tedenby loses the stubbornness and agrees to listen to the people who have forgotten more about ice hockey than the sum of what Tedenby currently knows, I think he could break through.
I still havent given up on thiskid23 year old.
Admittedly, he's no longer a fetus, so you cant use that excuse anymore, but he is young and seemingly moronically stubborn. If Tedenby loses the stubbornness and agrees to listen to the people who have forgotten more about ice hockey than the sum of what Tedenby currently knows, I think he could break through.
How on Earth is he stubborn?
I wouldn't call it stubborn, it's more like his hockey IQ is extremely lacking. He is brutal position-wise in the d-zone and his decision making with the puck in the offensive zone is questionable. Too much hot dogging and turnovers near the blueline..
Why was this a one way contract? I'm a little baffled because they're usually not given to players who haven't been able to prove they're able to stick in the NHL yet.
He took a $275,000 paycut to get the 1-way. And at this point if he doesn't have it, it's only a year. He can be traded, waived, discarded in some other fashion. It's very low risk.
I'm not worried about the risk at all. I just hope this doesn't mean he'll be forced onto the team again just cause he's on a one way. I really can't see them paying him all that to play in the AHL either.
He has to clear waivers to go to the AHL. I don't think he'd clear, for all his faults it's too high reward/no risk for another team to grab him. He'll ride the bench if the NHL isn't working...
I'm just hoping there's other moves to be made like maybe one in UFA? Even if it's an amnesty guy. I'd expect Josefson gets a one way also, I would have thought he'd also get a two way but I would have bet he'd get a one way before Tedenby would. Maybe Lou has a good idea that Clarkson is on the way out?
Tedenby could be like the 2013 Pierre Dagenais I guess. He was picked up off waivers I believe by Florida after we waived him. If Tedenby had a two way though, would he still not have been waiver exempt?
The difference between a 1-way and a 2-way contract is solely the amount a player is paid in the NHL versus the AHL. Waiver exempt status is unrelated to 1-way or 2-way contracts. Tedenby now has too much NHL experience to be waiver exempt.I'm just hoping there's other moves to be made like maybe one in UFA? Even if it's an amnesty guy. I'd expect Josefson gets a one way also, I would have thought he'd also get a two way but I would have bet he'd get a one way before Tedenby would. Maybe Lou has a good idea that Clarkson is on the way out?
Tedenby could be like the 2013 Pierre Dagenais I guess. He was picked up off waivers I believe by Florida after we waived him. If Tedenby had a two way though, would he still not have been waiver exempt?