Triumph
Registered User
- Oct 2, 2007
- 13,537
- 13,916
“All drafts aren’t the same” in other words being bad to get good is really more of a calculated risk than an actual reliable strategy. Funny how it’s not presented that way by the usual cohorts.
Anyone sensible on this topic has said that being bad for an extended period of time is not a guarantee of being good, but it is just how most of the best teams of the last 15 years have gotten their best players. It's not that all bad teams become good, but that most good teams have been bad. So you just had to follow the logic on that one, and of course this has been explained to you multiple times and you pretend not to hear it. Given that the Devils had no realistic choice except to be bad, I'm not sure what else can be said on this one.
Also funny how we are now starting to move the goal posts from Nico being unlucky to now saying expectations from him should have been lower from the start.
You started this off with a ridiculous claim that people have said Nico is unlucky wrt performance throughout his career, and he's not, his performance up until the last 8 games has been remarkably consistent if you want to judge by points. He has not been an inconsistent player in that regard in his career at all - you can cut up every season he's played and his performance points-wise is basically the same in all of them. What is true is that Nico was not thought to have high-end 1st line potential when he was drafted. His performance in junior is not suggestive of a 75+ point center. What was thought to be true is that Nico would be a solid two-way guy who depending on how his awareness works out can be a borderline 1C, and so far that's what appears to be happening.