You can keep derailing the topic to other current players but its really about forsberg + eakin vs. Nothing, and anyone with any sense would pick the first duo.
No one is trying to derail anything. We are just pointing out what we think 30 out of 30 coaches, and 30 out of 30 GMs, in the league would tell you. Which is that your team needs a healthy dose of grit.
When I called your proposed roster 'soft,' I was not calling out individual players such as Backstrom or Bura for being weak or cowardly or small or something like that; I was saying they are players who have skill and are looking, first and foremost, to make a play with the puck. They are not looking to hit first. They are not looking to rock an opponent and cause him to leave the game. They are not looking to avenge perceived dirty hits against teammates.
You really do need a handful of gritty, tough, energy guys on a team. Otherwise, the Bruins (or the Kings or the Flyers or the Blues, right down the line) will eat you for lunch. They will physically intimidate your team and grind you down physically and even injure your blue-chippers.
Have you never heard of the designation of 'top-6' forward? It suggests what GMs and coaches, over decades, have slowly agreed to and come to embrace, which is that the top half of your lineup, on balance, should tilt more to the skill side, and the bottom half should tilt more toward the grinders, hitters, defensively-sound forwards, fighters, and so-called 'energy guys,' guys who can forecheck forever and block shots and maybe kill penalties.
To fill a lineup with all (or mostly) skill would be a conceptual shift. I am not even saying it would absolutely be the wrong thing to do, but it would be a paradigm shift, like always going for it on the 4th-down in football, no matter what the field position, or regularly going to your bullpen after 4 innings instead of 6 or 7 innings. I am just saying that the overwhelming majority of GMs and coaches at all levels of professional hockey wouldn't do it.
Look at Trotz. Do you think he believes that Brown and O'Brien are more skilled than, say, Nathan Walker in Hershey? No. Walker has loads more skill. But he is not ripe for fourth-line duty. Nor is Kuzya, to tell you the truth. He himself would be described by most as a top-6 type forward, but there just isn't room for him right now, and so he idles on 4th line, getting 4-6 min per night, unless there's a blowout like tonight. And if you were absolutely bent on dressing Forsberg and Eakin for the night, yes, I am here to tell you that Kuzya would get sent down to Hershey before O'Brien or Brown did. The coach simply does not want a lineup overweighted with skill players. The conventional wisdom, and again, maybe you are visionary and thinking outside the box, but the conventional wisdom is that with too much skill and finesse, your team gets steamrolled.
You may say, 'We're only talking about two players. What difference does that make? It makes the whole team soft?'
I would answer that analysts through the years have suggested that our squad is
already too soft and has been that way for a long, long time. They say we are too reliant on skilled European players and that we bet too heavily on Russians, draft-wise, leading to a soft-as-butter culture and an easy road rink to play in.
So yes, if you believe the Caps are already verging on too soft, then swapping out Brown and O'Brien or any others of their ilk, for Eakin and Forsberg would not be the direction you want to go in.