I'll say the same thing I said in an earlier thread about this, people are always very quick to point out cases where they were right, but are nowhere to be seen when it's time to own up for times when they were wrong. The difference between amateurs on the internet and professionals is the professional has to own both.
Honestly, this doesn't mean much to me. The difference between amateurs and professionals is they're paid to make the tough decisions when prospects are close, and they base those tough choices over way more info and footage than we have. We (amateurs) typically just get up in arms when they make an obviously bad choice. For myself, in ~12-13 years on being interested in prospects and being on this board, I've only ever taken a real issue with the Tedenby and Zacha picks. I know some like to nitpick over 2nd/3rd round (maybe later) picks, but I don't see enough (really any) or read enough info on those players to make any judgement. And I don't give a hard time over players just not turning out well, but otherwise still being a logical choice in the 1st round at the time (Josefson for example).
And I will gladly own up to being wrong on Zacha if he turns it around and becomes a consistent 50+ point player. Why? Because I'm a fan of the team and I care more about winning another Cup than I do being right about his low offensive potential. And I think, with the addition of Nico, Bratt, Butcher, etc...if Zacha turns in to a 50+ guy...we have an offense with real Cup potential.