when factoring in age, cap hit, contract length, expectation, potential and actual impact on games smith had a pretty solid year, its not hype, its just fact
It's actually opinion.
And of all the factors you listed, the one that really matters is actual impact on games.
When factoring in zone starts, quality of competition, ability to actually play defense then his year really wasn't solid at all, especially since he couldn't stay in the lineup.
And I swear we need to start tracking a stat like "Unforced icings" and "Icings that lead to goals"
"Going into the season I had a meeting with Blash right away and it wasn't what I really wanted to hear, but I feel like I changed his mind with my play and moved up in his eyes," Quincey said. "My goal was always to come back and play with Danny and shut down first lines. And at the end of the year when they needed it most that's where I was.
Here's a table with everyone's rankings so far. (Click on the picture for a popup.) My apologies if I incorrectly transcribed (or missed) anyone's rankings.
View attachment 89983
In text form, here's a quick summary of the data:
#1 - 1.61 (1 to 3): DeKeyser
#2 - 1.72 (1 to 3): Green
#3 - 3.78 (2 to 6): Quincey
#4 - 4.31 (3 to 6): Marchenko
#5 - 4.36 (1 to 7): Smith
#6 - 5.56 (4 to 6): Kronwall
#7 - 6.67 (4 to 7): Ericsson
. Kronwall and Ercisson ABSOLUTELY NOT were our two worst defencemen.
Makes me very sad to see this kind of things.
They had bad seasons on their levels, but still were better than many others. If guys don't meet what their expectations were, it doesn't mean they were worst.
One thing I agree, DeKeyser was clearly the best.
The Smith hype lives on.
I don't get it either. He was awesome for three playoff games, and invisible during the regular season.
when factoring in age, cap hit, contract length, expectation, potential and actual impact on games smith had a pretty solid year, its not hype, its just fact
its not opinion
do you expect more out of Crosby or a AA?
as if salary and cap hit have nothing to do with it, of course they do, the more a player is paid the more is expected from that player, thats business and the game is a business
i expect Kronwall, Green and JE to be out 3 best dmen because they're paid to be our 3 best dmen
Kronwall and Ercisson ABSOLUTELY NOT were our two worst defencemen.
Makes me very sad to see this kind of things.
They had bad seasons on their levels, but still were better than many others. If guys don't meet what their expectations were, it doesn't mean they were worst.
One thing I agree, DeKeyser was clearly the best.
Why would age, cap hit, expectation, and potential influence who is best? Those are all things unrelated to actual performance.
My big issue is you can't be the best defender getting the soft minutes. Anyone who says he's it is giving him a pat on the back for handling the secondary jobs while Kronwall and DK attempted to keep the damn team above water.
My second issue is even with the minutes he got he falls squarely into serviceable. I don't see any big moments of him being a secret, age 27, Kilingberg waiting to bust out on the top pair with elite offense or defense.
Who was the worst d-man if it wasn't Ericsson?
It is an opinion actually.
Opinion versus fact is something that's really not really up for debate.
ok fair enough, you do not expect more out of the players in pro sports who get paid the most in comparison to those who're paid less.
got it
Why would age, cap hit, expectation, and potential influence who is best? Those are all things unrelated to actual performance.
I didn't think Marchenko was that great. Really I think he and Ericsson are pretty interchangeable. One is young and a new name, the other is old and been around so I believe that greatly influences perceptions. Ill say this, I think our entire group is capable of finding success across the league. The Problem is aside from Kronwall, Green and DDK, we basically have a pile of #4-6 dmen.
If that's really what you think I was saying, I'm just going to back away slowly from the conversation at this point.
Absolutely. If all of our guys were paid and got ice-time like the 2nd and 3rd pairing guys that they are, I don't think there would be many complaints. Unfortunately, they're almost all playing and getting paid more than they're worth.
That said, there's no way Kronwall is anything better than a 3rd pairing guy, at this point (and I think he's regularly worse). Whether you think it's age or injuries, he's incapable of playing well enough to get more than bottom minutes on basically any defense in the league without making it noticeably worse. He's ploddingly slow, he can't pass, and he can't/won't hit, and some combination of those three things prevents him from doing just about anything at an above-replacement level on the ice.
Quincey over Dekeyser... based on???
Yea, 55 certainly had a rough year and if things continue I would agree with your assessment. I'm just not sure I believe he won't rebound if he can find his health again. Hell If healthy, I still think he can be a first unit PPQB and solid #2/3 type of guy. Then again, that might be asking a lot for a 35 year old with knee problems.
Looks like masses in here don't have any clue what they are analyzing.