All of those teams got phenomenal playoff scoring from defense.
Last 6 Cup winners playoff defensemen scoring:
CHI '13 - Keith 13 in 22
LAK '12 - Doughty 16 in 20
BOS '11 - Seidenberg 11 in 25 (two others with +10)
CHI '10 - Keith 17 in 22
PIT '09 - Gonchar 14 in 22
DET '08 - Kronwall 15 in 22
Last 6 Runners up:
BOS '13 - Chara 15 in 22
NJD '12 - Salvador 14 in 24 (!)
VAN '11 - Ehrhoff 12 in 23 (two others +10)
PHI '10 - Pronger 18 in 23
DET '09 - Lidstrom 16 in 21
PIT '08 - Gonchar 14 in 20
2011 was the only time in the past 6 years where BOTH teams in the SCF didn't have a 0.5 PPG or higher defenseman during the playoffs (and both 2011 teams had multiple D just under that mark).
Teams don't go deep unless they get significant offense from the back end.
Points are a little misleading. Most of the defensemen points are going to come on the strength of the forwards...If you look at what I said that started this conversation is goals from dmen are a bonus, they are like found money...and defenseman on a cup winning team hasn't scored more than 4 goals in the last 6 years...look at the leading dman goal scores from the cup winner in the last 6 years....goals from Dmen are pretty insignificant and if you look at this list in 5 of the 6 years its not even the best dman on the team...
Which goes directly to what I said previously; moving the puck, first pass, hitting the open man, getting your shot through is important... goal scoring not at all.
2013 Hawks Oduya / Seabrook 3 goals
2012 Kings Doughty 4 goals
2011 Bruins Ference 4 goals
2010 Hawks Byfuglien 11 but played forward. Seabrook 4 goals
2009 Pens Eaton 4 goals
2008 Wings Rafalski 4 goals