Miller Time
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2004
- 23,279
- 15,767
It's not the stating of it that's the issue... It's posters that mistake their opinions for fact that's silly and makes for bad takes & go nowhere "debates"Will always have a harder time with the ''objective fact'' premise. Again, it's a board of opinions. Facts, we can read it on NHL.com statsboard. We don't have to write in my opinion everytime.
Nope. But from what I can tell, it's the exact opposite that details these threads... Posters acting as if it's a given that Michkov is the next Kucherov, and that DR has no chance of delivering better impact at the NHL level.Thing is, some have a harder time accepting opinions of others when it goes against their opinion. That is ALSO NOT A FACT. Yes, right now, Reinbacher could become Pietrangelo and Michkov can become Yakupov. Most definately. But again...if we wait till we have the facts...what's the point in discussing the 2023 draft or even the 2024 one? Should we solely be reviewing the 2017 drafts and below?
It's possible to prefer the Habs picked Michkov without acting as if it's a given he'll be the better player.
"I think" is different than "it's a given".
AmenThe toxicity of the debate is not amongst ourselves. It's when it's directed towards a 18-year old kid that just want to develop in his own way. I might have a take on the subject...but if I see him on the street I won't shout...HEY YOU 2ND PAIR CEILING!!!!! I will say good luck 'cause in the end, I want my team to win. And no matter what whoever does elsewhere, he has to do well here.