Klefbom is insanely over rated on this board.
I think both Klefbom and Reinhart having relatively equal chances to be #2s.
Klefbom struggles because of his lack of hockey Iq defensively. Reinhart is a bit slow and offensively challenged.
Neither of these guys are likely to hit thier potential any time soon. Thier weaknesses are too big and require experience and a lot of work.
I still like Marincin the best of all these prospects. His weaknesses are the easiest to fix.
Klefbom is insanely overrated? Really?
You are saying he has a decent shot at becoming a no. 2, correct? Obviously for you that means that this would be a level headed assessment. You really need to define what insanely overrated means, and then define what "on this board" means. If that is one post every 1000 saying he's the new Doughty, then I guess you would be right but I'd argue that you definition of those words is wrong.
I know it is for no good since I have asked you the same question so many times now, but who is insanely overrating him? I think 99% of posters here have the exact same take on him as you do with respect to the part that he can become a #2. Even then, you keep on hitting at maybe 1% of the posters who on occasion exaggerate.
Really, for a guy who albeit playing on a bad team just came off a season where he knocked on top 40 in EV points, top 20 in EV TOI/G and the only rookie to play big minutes on PK. The only one close in EV and PK time amongst rookie D was Severson. Does he make misstakes, of course. All rookies do, but most have an experienced partner to clean up after them when they mess up, Severson had Green, Ekblad had Campbell, Klingberg had Goligosky. In the last couple of years Lindholm had Beauchemin, Brodin had Suter, and so on. Klefbom had Schultz... I wonder at times what the take on him would have been if he had played out the season with Fayne.
Based on that I would even say that expectations on him are very tempered to be honest. I also fall in the category of thinking of him as decent #2 by the way.
I am guessing he'll fall a bit as almost all sophomore D's do, and you'll probably be there to comment on it. I'd still argue that he is a decent #4 already (which was what the poster you replied to though he would be for his career, at best a #3).