Whoever gets the lion's share of the starts down the stretch should start game 1 if we make it into the playoffs. Whoever is playing better should get the lion's share of starts down the stretch.
I don't think it has to be Kari but it probably will be.
Whoever gets the lion's share of the starts down the stretch should start game 1 if we make it into the playoffs. Whoever is playing better should get the lion's share of starts down the stretch.
I don't think it has to be Kari but it probably will be.
i think it's the opposite. it's his athleticism that allows him to play his unconventional style.
If Kari isn't the no-brainer desicion to start in the playoffs, then trade him now. It should t even be up for debate. Kari is the guy.
If we make the playoffs, Kari needs experience. Playing Thomas at some silly hope for a Cup run would be a step back on much of the progress that would potentially have been made. This team needs playoff experience, Kari maybe more than anyone.
just because he flails around and makes "great" saves at times, doesn't make him athletic---it means he moves with massive sense of urgency/compete level---very drastic movements---when he falls on his butt and can't get up---- #notathletic
If we make the playoffs, Kari needs experience. Playing Thomas at some silly hope for a Cup run would be a step back on much of the progress that would potentially have been made. This team needs playoff experience, Kari maybe more than anyone.
I agree and disagree.
Kari is our goalie, he's the guy, and he's signed for a while. He needs the experience. On the other hand, if Thomas gets really hot with a couple shutouts in big games, etc. I can't blame Ruff for playing him more down the stretch and Kari riding pine. This isn't about feel good moral victories anymore. I don't care if winning the Cup seems out of the question, I will never have a problem playing a Cup winning goalie over a 30 year old with 2 playoff games to his name. I'm tired of always putting the big picture before everything else. If Kari's mentality is totally blown because he got outplayed by a geriatric mid-season acquisition that is a bigger issue.
I don't think you do things like that to send a message, you do it because you think it gives you the best chance to win. However, riding the hot hand and rewarding a successful player over another very good player is a fine message to send the rest of the team from where I sit.
I want Kari to get the experience more than anything, but I agree with you. It would set a bad precedent to not play the best player.
Here's my issue though .... how was never benching Gonchar or Whitney once this season not also a bad precedent? This is by no means an attempt to undermine your point. I'm genuinely curious.
I was sitting here reading your post thinking, "yeah, that's a great point, but ...." Doesn't it seem just as wrong to play a guy just because he's the geriatric player with skin's on the wall?
It seems like a double edged sword here, and I don't think there's a right answer. I understand why they don't bench a guy like Gonchar, and I understand why people want Kari Lehtonen regardless of how Thomas plays. Would seem this is the type of situation where the coach has to make the tough call and you're going to piss someone off. Based on that, specifically with the goalie situation, I don't think there's anyway Ruff takes the long term approach (get Kari experience). Coaches and players believe, because it's true, that anything can happen in the playoffs. Dallas never should have made it to the WCF in 2008. He's easily going to pick the hot hand in net regardless of fans believing it's right or wrong.
That wasn't what I was saying. I was using his credentials as good reason to support the decision to play him IF he is playing better than Kari. In that hypothetical, it's a little difficult for me as a playoff hockey starved fan to give one single **** about the long term future when we have games to win right in front of us.
I understand those fans who are thinking long term though.
What I said was a bit muddy, sorry.
What I mean was I agree the best player should play which I believe was your point. If Thomas is on fire, it's reasonable that he deserves to continue to play.
If we accept that as fact, where that sorta falls apart, is the way Whitney and Gonchar were handled. If we're only going to make decisions on play, those players would not have played every game this year.
So .. I do agree with you approach to goal based on fairness, but I wonder how that works when you consider not all decisions for this team have been based on a player's performance.