I have no problem being disappointed with how the draft played out, but I don't agree with being upset about the decision. This isn't an excuse ... it's reality, Dallas would have taken Kemell or Lekkerimaki but they go just before Dallas. We're not sure if that includes Ostlund on their list, but the plan wasn't to take Bichsel. We know that because Nill also confirmed he tried moving back after the forwards go off the board. This is an underwhelming draft. The moment Kemell goes to Nashville, we all knew that most hope of trading back evaporated.
The chips didn't fall in Dallas' favor, while I definitely can understand preferring the Russians or Lambert, I don't agree that you can say it's a slam dunk easy decision. I actually prefer Bichsel to the Russians from a risk standpoint. I'd have been fine though with Lambert, Oslund, Kulich, or Howard honestly over Bichsel, but again ... only moderately. I don't think it's in the same league as had they passed on a Nazar, Lekkerimaki, or Kemell who just weren't there to take.
It feels like Dallas made a reasonably good decision based on what was available whereas other decisions would have also been fine or maybe slightly superior. They didn't do anything egregious.
I don't see the Dellandrea comparable though in terms of disappointment. For me, that would have been taking Nathan Gaucher. Decent, physical Top 4 defensemen aren't a dime a dozen like defensive forwards. Even though they both might be safer, lower ceiling picks, Bichsel at least offers a more unique package.