Satastic
Nazi punks **** off
I don't know much about him but wasn't Yakupov labeled an egotistical jackass comin into the league???
Probably because he was Russian. I don't recall him actually having any problems.
I don't know much about him but wasn't Yakupov labeled an egotistical jackass comin into the league???
It's not even about the environment (even though it's a factor)I know it's OT, but Drai had no business staying in the NHL given the climate in EDM. Maybe give him 9 games to check him out, but let him get top minutes instead of keeping him in a ****** environment and putting him in a position to lose confidence.
The same could've been said about Yak when he was drafted.
It's not even about the environment (even though it's a factor)
Most big body offensive centers like Drai need time to develop. Just look through history:
Joe Thornton had a slow start
Spezza was sent back to juniors after being taken #2
Ryan Johansen was yo-yoed about and broke out 4 years after being drafted.
Grigorenko was rushed and looked terrible, they were thankfully able to turn that around before it was too late.
Surely a ****ing NHL executive could have made this simple ass connection and said "hey maybe sending Draisaitl back is smarter than having him in that toxic environment and barely developing with just over 10 minutes of TOI
Exactly.
There is zero reason for Draisaitl to still be on the Oilers right now. The WJC gave them the perfect opportunity to get him away from the team and to regain his confidence.
Instead they bench him a game and call up Lander who has been playing great in the AHL.
Then they send Lander down after only 1 game and call it "pre-planned".
The Oilers management team deserves all of the ridicule they get.
What an embarrassment.
What's more hilarious is that, since Fasth's anguish at the team after getting pulled, hasn't played one single game yet. Scrivens is starting again tonight. Typical oilers though. Say something against the morons management, and you get the short end of the stick.
The best player on the team at that time was Yashin.
He was forced into a larger role on a team that was expected to lose.
The team was accused of intentionally tanking which resulted in the draft lottery being created.
I honestly think that if Daigle had been drafted by a different team, he may have been a great player. But the situation he was brought into that had zero accountability and a losing culture ruined him as a player.
Through 2 and a half years, Yakupov has not shown to be anywhere near as good as Daigle was.
This is partly because Edmonton fans think more highly of Yakupov than he merits, but mostly because Daigle is the most-underestimated player in recent hockey history--a lingering result of having been marketed as "better than Lindros" prior to turning pro.
If the scouts had compared him to Janney and he had the exact same career, he wouldn't have been the poster boy for busts.
20 years later, the Daigle "narrative" doesn't match the reality of Daigle's career. The poster boy for "busts" didn't even bust. He came into the league as a beautifully skating, smallish, low-end 2 C with character issues and a muffin of a wrist shot and that's exactly how he left it.
Daigle was not Cam Barker or Rob Schremp.
As for the OP, there's a lot wrong there.
Daigle was given the 1C job in Ottawa. Yashin was behind him. Not the other way around. Yashin would cite his treatment during this period as justification for his contract holdout. He felt that the Sens had always treated him like a second-class citizen and was sick of being paid like one.
I said Yashin was the best player on that team and my statement was accurate, I don't get your argument..
So while Yashin may have technically been better, he was stuck in Daigle's shadow. Not the other way around.
I literally said he was forced into a larger role. It should have been Yashin's team.
Yakupov has not been forced into the role that Daigle was. Yakupov has been protected in the lineup throughout his career. Given minimal responsibilities. Daigle was thrown to the wolves. Daigle actually was as ready for this as he was ever going to be, so no, this did not hurt his development. There is no parallel. Their treatment on this front is opposite.
Are you seriously trying to tell me that Yakupov wasn't mistreated? What do you call playing on the 4th with players like Gazdic, is that protecting him? Even with the sheltered minutes Yakupov was brought in and expected to produce. Obviously not in the same scope as what Daigle faced but that wasn't my argument..
Source? I have no recollection of anyone thinking the Sens' losing was a result of anything other than incompetence.
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/08/24/sports/nhl-inquiry-on-senators.html
They were investigated and the lottery was introduced as a result.
The two things that hurt Daigle's development were a) his attitude and b) the arrival of the dead puck era. Daigle's game wasn't built for an obstruction NHL.
Centers with his frame in the DPE that had more success than Daigle were all some combination of stronger (Forsberg), harder working (Straka) or had a much better wrist shot (Sakic, Yzerman, Turgeon).
Daigle didn't have that stuff and wasn't going to no matter who had picked him. Some guys shoot hard, some guys don't. Some guys have high battle levels, some guys don't.
So, in answer to the TC, Yakupov and Daigle have very little in common beyond their size (roughly) and that they're great skaters. There's very little overlap with what is wrong with each other as hockey players.
One final note. People are acting like it's unfair to Yakupov to compare him to Daigle. This is exactly backwards.
Daigle was very much a low-end 2C. A 2C whose baggage exceeded his contributions, but a 2C, nonetheless. He came into the league as a 2C. He left it as a 2C. There were some off years around his first retirement, but he was fundamentally a second line center and produced like one, for the most part.
Through 2 and a half years, Yakupov has not shown to be anywhere near as good as Daigle was.
This is partly because Edmonton fans think more highly of Yakupov than he merits, but mostly because Daigle is the most-underestimated player in recent hockey history--a lingering result of having been marketed as "better than Lindros" prior to turning pro.
If the scouts had compared him to Janney and he had the exact same career, he wouldn't have been the poster boy for busts.
I simply don't agree with this. How do Oilers fans think more highly of Yakupov than he merits? When has he had a chance to prove his worth to the Oilers?
All one had to see in order to realize the Oilers could care less about Yakupov is watch the shootout vs the Stars on Sunday night. 8 shooters, Yakupov was not one of them. Marc Arcobello and ANTON LANDER were both chosen to shoot instead of Yakupov.
Daigle was a good player when he actually wanted to put an effort in, but I have no doubt that Yakupov will be the better player when all is said and done
I don't see how I was wrong. Daigle wasn't put into a position to succeed. There were likely a lot of things that attributed to his lack of success (DPE Etc..) but my point was that the playing in a losing culture, having a rotation of coaches, and using the NHL as a development league hurt him.
Similar to what Yak is facing now. I never said the situation is 100% the same.
What's more hilarious is that, since Fasth's anguish at the team after getting pulled, hasn't played one single game yet. Scrivens is starting again tonight. Typical oilers though. Say something against the morons management, and you get the short end of the stick.
Yakupov's downfall is a lack of understanding of the game. Clueless out there and hurts his team more than he helps. The injustice is that he has not been given an opportunity to figure it out - in the AHL, where mistakes are generally accepted as part of development. Eakins was handed a player that had zero concept of defensive awareness, and he focussed primarily on defensive responsibility (poorly i might add). He never fostered his offensive game. But in fairness, Eakins was trying to win games and marginalized Yak because he could not trust him. The new coach is following this same path. Coaches want to win games. Developing players is secondary.
Where the Oilers screwed up was not giving Yak an opportunity to develop his game in the AHL, with top line minutes and instruction focussed in player development. Yak is lost out there. The Oilers did him a huge disservice. Is he doomed? No, but if they continue down this road, they will ruin him because what they are doing is not working and it is alienating him.
Years ago MaxPac got so ftustrated with the Habs lack of direction and playing time that he asked to be demoted to Hamilton, where he could work on his game. Max had the foresight to understand what was in his best interest, while the Habs brass did not.
If i am the Oilers i put Yak in the AHL on a "conditioning" stint. He still counts to the cap and earns his NHL pay, and would not have to pass waivers. IMO that is the right move.
Yakupov's most common linemates from last season were, in order, Gagne, Nugent-Hopkins, Eberle, Perron and Hemsky. This isn't a murderer's row, but it's not being put in a position to fail, either. It's not as if he's lining up next to Bob Kudelski. Yakupov dropped an absolute bomb.
If Yakupov wants to be a better player than Daigle, he better get going. I'm old enough to have seen a young Daigle and Yakupov is not currently close to his level at around the same age.
Someone had already told you in another thread that he lost his waiver eligibility a few games ago. Even with his issues, Yakupov would get claimed.
What in the **** were the Oilers thinking not sending Draisatl back to Juniors? Makes no sense to burn a year of his contract and expose him to such a depressing situation.
Yakupov seems to be trying, it's just his consistency that is difficult. Daigle was more interested in dating Pam Anderson than playing hockey.
I jsut don't think the scenarios are relative.
lol then they healthy scratched him after they told germany they wouldnt loan him