I'll measure this team by my expectations coming into the season, and not the expectations I have now. This team is already a success. I didn't even have them making the playoffs to be honest. Though we would be sending out Krejci and Bergeron at the deadline for picks and prospects. Yet, this team has been good... well not just good. Historically good.
This team is on par with the Habs from the late 70s. Or the Bruins from the early 70's. Go look at the 1978-79 Montreal Canadians roster. Go look at the 1971-72 Bruins roster. They are littered with hall of fame players at every position. That is how good this team is, I'm still having a difficult time comprehending it.
There are only 2 things I want to see before the season end that I think would make this season perfect. #33 to the rafters on the final home game of the season. Raising a Stanley cup banner in the spring. Though neither are expected at this point.
No moral victories. All time point record incoming and first round you get to slap around the Sabres, Sens or Pens. Then this roster has to go 12-9 at worst to win the Cup. Team will lose at least 3 quality players due to the cap next year and I doubt Krejci comes back. No 1sts of 2nds for multiple years and a bottom 5 prospect pool. Need to win this year.
FWIW I thought they were going to win in 2010 and we all know what happened that year and then they won the Stanley Cup the season/year after.Pretty simple, boys and girls.
Do the Bruins need to win the Cup in order for you to consider this season a success?
I’m actually going to say “No”.
I did not expect them to have this level of success. I was ready for a full on rebuild, the sooner the better.
This has been a hell of a ride and I’ve enjoyed it no matter what.
I voted ‘no’.
Here’s why. As deep as they are and as great a TDL Sweeney had I’ve lived long enough to know that it takes even more to get the Cup. That being health, a degree of luck, hot goaltending and to an extent officiating.
same.Same.
I'm in this line of thinking.Obviously, I love to see them raise the cup. But also respect what they've done so far.
No guaranties about the future, ever.
They're giving it their best shot and I'm enjoying every game.
I think this is going to be one of the toughest cups to win in recent memory for whomever wins it. The east will a war with Toronto, Tampa, Rangers, and the Devil's all adding significant pieces. And the wildcard teams of Ottawa, Florida, Islanders and Buffalo will all be a challenge.
And Seattle, Vegas, Dallas, Edmonton or Colorado coming out of the west will be another tough challenge in the final.
It's cup or bust, but not because of the competition.
It really boils down to how people define success. It's all relative, but for a team setting records, it feels like the only thing they haven't proven was getting to the end (and to be honest, Bergeron and Krejci were the only one's left from 12 years ago).Is for me if they went 82-0 and went out in the first round I would say it was a wasted season.
I agree 100%It really boils down to how people define success. It's all relative, but for a team setting records, it feels like the only thing they haven't proven was getting to the end (and to be honest, Bergeron and Krejci were the only one's left from 12 years ago).
Let's not pretend this team is going to be exactly same next year, so in order to call this season a success, to me, they need to win it. I know the path to the Stanley Cup isn't easy, it never is. But for a team with 1 cup in the last 50 years, Original 6; the let down of 2013 and 2019, if the bar isn't at Stanley Cup, then why bother? No one's gonna buy a Bruins President Trophy shirt or memorabilia. I'm certainly not looking back at 2014 or 2020 as success stories.
Regular season awards are neat. But to me, the final prize is what we need. As fans, as an organization. As Bergeron and Krejci's legacy. I don't EXPECT them to win, but that should be the absolute goal. And a goal they will do all that they can to achieve.
Does anyone talk about Bruins team of 1990, 2014, or 2020 in the same breath as the 2011 team? Each of the former teams were close enough to a final (either the year prior or the same season), but there's a reason why Ray Bourque needed to leave Boston to get a cup, otherwise, would he have considered 1990 a success?) 2011 team, regular season winners were the Vancouver Canucks.
I'm sure no one here (or even their own fanbase) will call the Canucks 2011 a success story.
I'm not a football fan, but how many Pats fans call their undefeated season a success when they flubbed the ending?
Regular season is cool, but it sets the expectations. I'm happy the team is doing great. I'm not gonna disown them if they don't win it all or anything like that... but with this record setting season; anything less than winning it all seems like a let down. Ever season, every building year, every let down, they've been building to this year. And they need to get it down, because for some players on this roster, there's not gonna be a next time.
Sorry for the rant, but if anything less than the cup is a success, I think we have an extremly different definition of success for a pro-sports team with its current resume.
With this in mind, remember, we've won a grand total of one Cup in the last 51 years.Isn’t it Cup or bust every year though? Certainly around here it is.
And even the rosiest probabilities like Dom at the Athletic or 529 has the Bruins chance of winning the Cup at 35% or so.With this in mind, remember, we've won a grand total of one Cup in the last 51 years.