Corsica Hockey algorithmic Canuck player ratings

Blue and Green

Out to lunch
Dec 17, 2017
3,437
3,415
Posting these just FYI. They're based on data that considers more than just the current season but is weighted toward recency, and players with smaller sample sizes (Pettersson) are moved toward the mean compared to players of a similar per-game quality with a fuller complement of games. Only current NHL roster/injured reserve players are available. The ratings seem to update weekly so these would be as of last Sunday's games.

I separated them into forwards and defencemen, showing the ranking within the appropriate group. I've also divided them into tiers of 31 so you could get an idea of where a player would rate approximately on an average team-- e.g., (5) indicates 5th forwards or 5th defencemen.

The idea is not to suggest that these are the gospel but rather to challenge the assumptions that each of us has about the players.

Forwards (out of 451):
Boeser 24 (1)
Pettersson 41 (2) Continues to rise as the sample size increases
Horvat 105 (4)
Baertschi 131 (5)
Leivo 164 (6)
Eriksson 239 (8)
Granlund 259 (9)
Sutter 319 (11)
Virtanen 336 (11)
Roussel 344 (12)
Goldobin 386 (13)
Motte 412 (14)
Schaller 426 (14)
Beagle 440 (14)

Defencemen (out of 245):
Edler 47 (2)
Stecher 100 (4)
Tanev 152 (5)
Hutton 176 (6)
Biega 181 (6)
Pouliot 182 (6)
Gudbranson 242 (8)

Markstrom is rated 37th of 71 goalies.
 

Horse McHindu

They call me Horse.....
Jun 21, 2014
9,668
2,650
Beijing
I mean it’s interesting, but again.......advanced stats and corsi analysis isn’t Biff Tannen’s Sports almanac......and if it was, then Florida and Arizona would have emerged into contender status a few years back.

Advanced Analytics and Corsi are good indicators of many things, but there’s obviously far more to being a good hockey player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FacepalmBenning

xtra

Registered User
May 19, 2002
8,323
4,765
Vancouver
Visit site
I mean it’s interesting, but again.......advanced stats and corsi analysis isn’t Biff Tannen’s Sports almanac......and if it was, then Florida and Arizona would have emerged into contender status a few years back.

Advanced Analytics and Corsi are good indicators of many things, but there’s obviously far more to being a good hockey player.

Yup these stats don’t take into account leadership which as we all know is the driving factor in the worth of a player
 

Josepho

i want the bartkowski thread back
Jan 1, 2015
14,790
8,302
British Columbia
I mean it’s interesting, but again.......advanced stats and corsi analysis isn’t Biff Tannen’s Sports almanac......and if it was, then Florida and Arizona would have emerged into contender status a few years back.

Advanced Analytics and Corsi are good indicators of many things, but there’s obviously far more to being a good hockey player.

Except Florida and Arizona aren't actually fully invested in analytics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cookiefest

xtra

Registered User
May 19, 2002
8,323
4,765
Vancouver
Visit site
Posting these just FYI. They're based on data that considers more than just the current season but is weighted toward recency, and players with smaller sample sizes (Pettersson) are moved toward the mean compared to players of a similar per-game quality with a fuller complement of games. Only current NHL roster/injured reserve players are available. The ratings seem to update weekly so these would be as of last Sunday's games.

I separated them into forwards and defencemen, showing the ranking within the appropriate group. I've also divided them into tiers of 31 so you could get an idea of where a player would rate approximately on an average team-- e.g., (5) indicates 5th forwards or 5th defencemen.

The idea is not to suggest that these are the gospel but rather to challenge the assumptions that each of us has about the players.

Forwards (out of 451):
Boeser 24 (1)
Pettersson 41 (2) Continues to rise as the sample size increases
Horvat 105 (4)
Baertschi 131 (5)
Leivo 164 (6)
Eriksson 239 (8)
Granlund 259 (9)
Sutter 319 (11)
Virtanen 336 (11)
Roussel 344 (12)
Goldobin 386 (13)
Motte 412 (14)
Schaller 426 (14)
Beagle 440 (14)

Defencemen (out of 245):
Edler 47 (2)
Stecher 100 (4)
Tanev 152 (5)
Hutton 176 (6)
Biega 181 (6)
Pouliot 182 (6)
Gudbranson 242 (8)

Markstrom is rated 37th of 71 goalies.


I think the most surprising things for me here are levivo, bae, who I would expect to be lower so I’ll re evaluate them when I watch them next and that Hutton and tanev are ranked as 5/6 dmen, when I would have had them higher

Most of the rest I’m not supposed about
 
  • Like
Reactions: daddyohsix

PuckMunchkin

Very Nice, Very Evil!
Dec 13, 2006
12,378
10,037
Lapland
I mean it’s interesting, but again.......advanced stats and corsi analysis isn’t Biff Tannen’s Sports almanac......and if it was, then Florida and Arizona would have emerged into contender status a few years back.

Advanced Analytics and Corsi are good indicators of many things, but there’s obviously far more to being a good hockey player.

Dale Tallon ruined what the stat boys built in Florida. Can you imagine the team they have + Marchessault & Smith.

Arizona is working under a self inflicted cap and has only had Chayka as GM for 2 seasons. Jimbo has been here "rebuilding" twice as long.
 
  • Like
Reactions: y2kcanucks

Fire Benning

diaper filled piss baby
Oct 2, 2016
6,970
8,252
Hell
The numbers test and the eye test agree, Gudbranson is absolute dogshit.

He’s probably #1 out of 245 if you were to re-arrange these rankings based on locker room presence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PredsForPresidents

Peter10

Registered User
Dec 7, 2003
4,193
5,042
Germany
Not even sure I would put Arizona in the "analytics" category anymore. Sure it is Chaykas background and he may use it but some of the moves are rather questionable and I would think there is some pressure from ownership too to ice a playoff team in order to create interest in the market. Making the move for Stephan or the Schmaltz/Strome trade are among the more iffy transactions he made.
 

Josepho

i want the bartkowski thread back
Jan 1, 2015
14,790
8,302
British Columbia
And the worst part about the "But Florida and Arizona!" comments are that they never acknowledge that LA's system revolved around shot attempts (which is just one of many advanced stats) and that Pittsburgh went very analytical in their transactions in the 2015 offseason before winning back to back cups.

"The only teams that use analytics are the ones that go against my narrative".
 

ErrantShepherd

Nostalgic despite the Bad
Dec 2, 2018
980
634
...Canada, eh?
I find it really weird that some people are so fond of subjective information and are so adverse towards objective information.

Probably because subjective info like a feeling about a player tends to require less explanation than objective info like zone starts, corsi, and other statistical info.

I think analytics are incredibly useful, but I'm not going to pretend I know what I'm talking about if I don't know what a stat is supposed to be showing me... whereas anybody can talk about how they feel/what they see.
 

Horse McHindu

They call me Horse.....
Jun 21, 2014
9,668
2,650
Beijing
Except Florida and Arizona aren't actually fully invested in analytics.

I don’t know about now, but they definitely were for a sizeable stretch there. Florida’s owners specifically moved out certain players and kept certain players based purely on the analytics.
 

Horse McHindu

They call me Horse.....
Jun 21, 2014
9,668
2,650
Beijing
Dale Tallon ruined what the stat boys built in Florida. Can you imagine the team they have + Marchessault & Smith.

Arizona is working under a self inflicted cap and has only had Chayka as GM for 2 seasons. Jimbo has been here "rebuilding" twice as long.

So the moral of the story here is that....

1) Arizona has actually only been rebuilding for two years.

2) Most teams that successfully rebuild do it in significantly less time than 4 years.

3) A mysterious parting of the ways from Advanced Analytics as opposed to letting Gerard Gallant go had far more to do with Florida flatlining.

LOL.

Cool story.
 

pgj98m3

Registered User
Jan 8, 2012
1,539
1,078
So the moral of the story here is that....

1) Arizona has actually only been rebuilding for two years.

2) Most teams that successfully rebuild do it in significantly less time than 4 years.

3) A mysterious parting of the ways from Advanced Analytics as opposed to letting Gerard Gallant go had far more to do with Florida flatlining.

LOL.

Cool story.
Provide a better explanation oh wise one.....
 

Josepho

i want the bartkowski thread back
Jan 1, 2015
14,790
8,302
British Columbia
I don’t know about now, but they definitely were for a sizeable stretch there. Florida’s owners specifically moved out certain players and kept certain players based purely on the analytics.

Tom Rowe was their GM for less than 18 months. While he was there they had one bad-ish season when

A) Their top line winger was out for 50 games and their top line center was out for 20.
B) Any advanced stats from the previous year suggested that the Panthers were likely going to regress in the first place.

And I'm not sure if there's a single move made by Rowe that you can look at and think that the Panthers really regretted making. Kulikov and Gudbranson are both bottom pairing defencemen on their best days. They paid a pretty cheap price to get out of awful Bolland contract. They signed a 30 goal scorer for nothing towards the end. I suppose firing Gallant was their worst move but at least it seemed to be rooted in the fact that GMs and coaches should have similar philosophies.

Then 97 year old Dale Tallon returns after that year and they gift the eventual Western Conference Champions with two of their top liners so they could protect some trash 3rd pairing "character" defenceman.

And now the Panthers are likely going to miss the playoffs for the 7th time in 9 years since he's joined the organization.

But it's still somehow the nerds' faults.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad