A funny tidbit from the Jets forum:
"Tanner Glass had CF% of 0 and Corsi Rel % of -52.9%"
This is a serious accomplishment. It suggests that you are parked in a wheel chair in your own zone.
What does that mean?
A funny tidbit from the Jets forum:
"Tanner Glass had CF% of 0 and Corsi Rel % of -52.9%"
This is a serious accomplishment. It suggests that you are parked in a wheel chair in your own zone.
He follows the x's and o's (which I bet Bylsma loves) and doesn't bother to watch the play or his man so he's always 2 steps further away from the puck than he should be. He shouldn't be in the NHL, though he'd probably dominate the AHL physically.
What does that mean?
Corsi Number = (Shots on Target For + Missed Shots For + Blocked Shots Against ) - (Shots on Target Against + Missed Shots Against + Blocked Shots For)
Relative Corsi Number = Corsi Number of player - Corsi Number of Team when player not on ice
Pens Corsi for the Season: http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67#
I hate Corsi Numbers.
^ those don't yet include the last two games where Adams & Glass were especially bad.
I hate Corsi Numbers.
The list of wingers plugging that hole on Sid's line until Bennett gets back is going to be hilarious.
It takes a special talent to be even worse than -24.1!
WHY?!?!?!
We're getting BB as our TDL acquisition!!
If I need a calculator for it, then I don't like it.
We would be better and no, you are right, Shero isn't going to do it. The way he and Bylsma obviously pulled for Orpik for team USA says enough about that.
I understand that, but I can make an argument that Orpik should be on the US Olympic team regardless, and his chemistry/familiarity with Martin is a bonus. As one of 8 Dmen, I think having Orpik there is not without merit. We know from the Bobby Ryan situation that one or sometimes two people's input is not enough to have a player make the team. I wouldn't necessarily pick Orpik if only 6 guys were going, but if 8 guys are going, yeah, there are legit reasons for him to be there -- including Martin's merit of being there, and Orpik's chemistry with him.
That all said, I would hope that Orpik's selection to the tourney, and if he performs well there (or at least stays healthy between now and for the duration of the tourney), would only improve Orpik's value on the trade market. Again, I don't believe Shero has the balls to do this, but it could increase his value should he decide to ahead and do this. If I, personally, was Shero, I would both recommend Orpik's selection to the USA team, AND trade him afterwards. Unfortunately, I'm not Ray Shero
I still don't see how Orpik's inclusion in the olympic team affects his eventual contract negotiations with the Pens. We already know they like him, as most people do, but Team USA doesn't have to worry about salary caps or developing players.
There's still a possibility of him re-signing since we only have six D for next year (Martin, Letang, Scuderi, Bortuzzo, Maatta with Despres as RFA) and we're going to need more than that. Not that I'm advocating it.
What does that mean?
When Tanner Glass was out on the ice (AT ANY TIME), the Pens were unable to register at least a single SOG...hence the 0% CF. It is a rare feat to say the least. It probably happens at the same rate as scoring a goal 5 different ways. It is epicly horrible and indicative of the man crush that Bylsma has for these Michael Boltons (ie no talent ass clowns) on our 4th line. It was basically a PK when Glass was on the ice 5v5.
Say what you will about the Adamses and Glasses of the world, but Michael Bolton is certainly talented. His music is awful, but it's not for lack of singing ability
especially now that the snow is falling downI celebrate the man's entire catalog.
Say what you will about the Adamses and Glasses of the world, but Michael Bolton is certainly talented. His music is awful, but it's not for lack of singing ability
Why did Bylsma send the beautiful Despregesaus to the glue factory?
I celebrate the man's entire catalog.