Idk I'd say most Hawks fans on here have been happy with Pirri's play and want him to stay in the lineup. I think it was just a few people who went on and on about him being a liability on defense. Whether that was exaggerated or not doesn't really matter bc he's shown improvement in his own end.
I'd rather see him with Saad and Kane, but don't have a huge problem with him on the third line as long as he's playing.
There's other places on the internet to talk Hawks, too, guys.
I don't think anyone here is against Brandon Pirri. That being said - not all of us are in the 'he can do no wrong and he is a victim of Q's irrational decisions' camp.
Lazerus and the other beat writers don't have to go to the HF to hear Hawks fans complain about the lines. They get it right away from fans as soon as they tweet the lines with Handzus at 2c every day.
I don't think anyone here is against Brandon Pirri. That being said - not all of us are in the 'he can do no wrong and he is a victim of Q's irrational decisions' camp.
Like you said to me a week ago - can you now admit you were wrong?
Lazerus and the other beat writers don't have to go to the HF to hear Hawks fans complain about the lines. They get it right away from fans as soon as they tweet the lines with Handzus at 2c every day.
What was I wrong about?
There's other places on the internet to talk Hawks, too, guys.
There's other places on the internet to talk Hawks, too, guys.
Put Handzus with Sharp and Hossa and move Toews to the second line
I lol'd.
Two - IMHO - intelligent people with differing viewpoints about the game of hockey. If you have an issue with people having dissenting opinions then a message board is probably not the place for you.
1) Hawks are 1st in goals per game and 17th in goals against per game. Q will pick a 2C based on who helps with the latter stat.
2) Patrick Kane is the only regular forward on the Hawks who is minus on the season in the +/- department. He's mostly played on line 2. Again, 2C is going to be picked on goals against instead of goals for.
Of course this is all conjecture, but isn't this all? Q might be a little crazy but there is a method to the madness if you look closely (at least to me).
I like Q. Some head scratchers but he sticks to his system. And I don't think there is a better 5 v 5 system in the NHL. Now if we could find some consistency w/ the special teams...
1) Hawks are 1st in goals per game and 17th in goals against per game. Q will pick a 2C based on who helps with the latter stat.
2) Patrick Kane is the only regular forward on the Hawks who is minus on the season in the +/- department. He's mostly played on line 2. Again, 2C is going to be picked on goals against instead of goals for.
Of course this is all conjecture, but isn't this all? Q might be a little crazy but there is a method to the madness if you look closely (at least to me).
I like Q. Some head scratchers but he sticks to his system. And I don't think there is a better 5 v 5 system in the NHL. Now if we could find some consistency w/ the special teams...