so you're arguing against a process that won them three cups because it didn't come up aces every time they needed to trade good talent? teams lose trades at times , sometimes badly. Chicago is not immune to that. panarin they also got for free and they also got Kubalik for a measly fifth
I think when factoring in winning three cups, we don't have much to whine about
What? When did the "process" that led to Chicago winning three cups involve signing players to bad contracts? They didn't have to pay Toews like the best player in the league. They did win another cup after they signed that one, but the Bickell and Seabrook contracts that cost them Teuvo and Panarin were signed after they had already won. So whatever the process was that won them the three cups either hasn't been followed or has led them to the bottom of the Western Conference.
Anyway, they are in a tight spot now and even if they buy out Maatta that still only gives them about $10M to re-sign Kubalik and Strome, as well as signing a starting and backup goalie. Kubalik and Strome are each worth at least $4M per, so I don't see how the Hawks keep both.