joestevens29
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 52,888
- 15,672
Never posted a thread in here and didn't see one, so forgive me if there was one.
Is there a reason why guys can't be re-signed 2 years early instead of 1?
I feel it would allow some of the smaller market teams a chance to receive a better return for a star player that they can't keep by being able to move them with some term left.
Is there something I'm missing that would result in some sort of bad trickle down effect?
Was it something the teams wanted so that they don't look into a bad contract too soon?
Is there a reason why guys can't be re-signed 2 years early instead of 1?
I feel it would allow some of the smaller market teams a chance to receive a better return for a star player that they can't keep by being able to move them with some term left.
Is there something I'm missing that would result in some sort of bad trickle down effect?
Was it something the teams wanted so that they don't look into a bad contract too soon?