I'm just going to reserve full judgment till other shoes drop or don't. We saw last year that just because you think that shoe will drop, doesn't mean it will.
If we set up other moves and think de Haan was too big of a risk, I'll be down with it. Otherwise, seems worrisome.
Whether or not this helps us down the line, I don’t like the fact that we had to move de Haan after one year. I guess this means the market for Faulk was very weak.
I'm initially not a fan of downgrading our D (and one of our few "vets") in order to acquire yet another unspectacular Chicago backup goalie...especially since he's an RFA. Unless there's more it seems like CDH > Forsling + RFA G (yet we add Saarela)?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.