Doug19
Registered User
Jarmo must have existing plans that coincide with the 2020, 2021 and 2022 drafts.
He's saying that's the next GMs problem if this all goes south.
Jarmo must have existing plans that coincide with the 2020, 2021 and 2022 drafts.
As I always preface, my guess is that the defense in front has been brutually bad. Also, there was probably a 10 game stretch this season where those numbers were in line with Bobs preformances. Look where we are now ?I don't get this at all. I get it, the devils haven't been good this year but Kincaid has been awful.
in his last 10 games that he's appeared in, he has given up 42 goals. so roughly a 4.20 GAA to go along with a .868 save percentage (!!!)
It means we dont trust berube if things get bad
It means that every quality guy we have behind Bob and Korpi is in Europe and so can't be called up if someone gets injured.
Not being here? LOLJarmo must have existing plans that coincide with the 2020, 2021 and 2022 drafts.
Coming around to the idea that this is insurance on injury. If Jarmo is gonna be "all in" at forward, then he's gonna want to hedge his bets against something happening in net and wanting to have another guy who can play.
Is he gonna carry all three guys on the NHL roster? Could this be why Clendening was sent down (there was some concern there is no bench/scratch at D), at least until this all sorts itself out?
There are no roster limits after the deadline so I’m assuming all 3 guys will be here.
Definite upgrade over Korpi
This is where I finally disagree with Jarmo. You already have a backup. You don't need two. Jarmo actually drafts well with late picks.
I'm not so sure.
What happens if one of them gets hurt?
What happens if one of them gets hurt?
That's when you put in your back up.
I think you meant "what happens if two of them get hurt?"
If Bob or Korp is out for an extended period of time...
That's when you put in your back up.
I think you meant "what happens if two of them get hurt?"
It's not what I meant. Not sure why this is funny. Not sure why I need to explain it to you. It's pretty evident. You let me know if you want an explanation.
I don't know why it makes me laugh. You keep saying different versions of "what if someone gets hurt", when you already have 2 goalies. You need two of them to get hurt to actually have a problem. Yes, I know that's what you meant, but I prefer to have fun responding to statements as if they were literal.
I don't know why it makes me laugh. You keep saying different versions of "what if someone gets hurt", when you already have 2 goalies. You need two of them to get hurt to actually have a problem. Yes, I know that's what you meant, but I prefer to have fun responding to statements as if they were literal.