News Article: Carey Price named NHL's 1st star of the week

Habsawce

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
31,301
2,607
Canada
Dreger is literally the worst. For anyone who actually likes him, go sit in the stands when his kid is playing and then reassess your opinion :laugh::laugh:
 

ottawahabs

Registered User
Jul 22, 2013
82
0
Speaking of Dreger, I found this gem online: ‏@Hope_Smoke 4h

Dreger "it was easy to be critical of Price outside of his last 8 games where he brought his A game"

If this is an accurate quote, the guy only looked at stats and didn't watch the games.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
75,371
45,397
Speaking of Dreger, I found this gem online: ‏@Hope_Smoke 4h

Dreger "it was easy to be critical of Price outside of his last 8 games where he brought his A game"

If this is an accurate quote, the guy only looked at stats and didn't watch the games.
Dreger's a dumbass.
 

MXD

Original #4
Oct 27, 2005
50,825
16,555
"Lars Eller would have gotten it if he would have played 23 minutes a game"

- Guess the author.
 

Maffew

Born. Raised. Habs. Always.
May 14, 2010
6,956
881
Montréal, QC
"Sources within Hockey Canada tell me that Jonathan Bernier was 'very close' to securing a roster spot at the Olympics, possibly even at the expense of Carey Price. It is not believed the Leafs are shopping Bernier, but one league source tells me a trade involving Bernier would return a 1st round pick, a roster player, and a top prospect."

Pretty easy, honestly.

haha, was going to post something almost exactly like this before seeing it. Goes to show how predictable the talking head of Dregs has become.
 

Godzilla

Registered User
Jun 7, 2011
2,883
1,343
Montreal
So far he hasn't impress me, but I will give him a chance cause he said when I feel we're ready i'll make the moves. We'll see if he has the balls to make a few moves and it starts in 3 weeks and see if he moves veterans like Gionta, Murray or even Markov
¸

Oh, I am sure he has the balls. The question is, which GM is stupid enough to take them at any price?
 

Hackett

BAKAMAN
Mar 4, 2002
21,545
9
Visit site
Its interesting that two out of the three Canadian goalies are known to known to move the puck very well. I wonder how much of an impact that element has into the decision making of who should be the #1.
 

MSLs absurd thighs

Formerly Tough Au Lit
Feb 4, 2013
9,424
4,280
Its interesting that two out of the three Canadian goalies are known to known to move the puck very well. I wonder how much of an impact that element has into the decision making of who should be the #1.

Close to none. They're going to choose with favoritism once again and give it to Luongo, as pathetic as it might be. Hope I'm wrong.
 

Hackett

BAKAMAN
Mar 4, 2002
21,545
9
Visit site
Close to none. They're going to choose with favoritism once again and give it to Luongo, as pathetic as it might be. Hope I'm wrong.

Giving it to luongo at this point would be a move based on loyalty, and we saw what happened to the 2006 team when loyalty seemed paramount. That is unless price completely blows his first start and luongo doesn't.
 

Brainiac

Registered Offender
Feb 17, 2013
12,709
610
Montreal
Funny how this thread is only 2 pages long so far!

Price is having a great year and let's hope he won't be left alone to carry the team come playoffs time. :handclap:
 

NobleSix

High Tech Low-Life.
Apr 20, 2013
16,914
15,933
CyberSpace
www.ilovebees.co
So far he hasn't impress me, but I will give him a chance cause he said when I feel we're ready i'll make the moves. We'll see if he has the balls to make a few moves and it starts in 3 weeks and see if he moves veterans like Gionta, Murray or even Markov

Only one of those three guys are moveable. If anybody wanted Murray, they would have signed him for 1.5 mill in the offseason, and he hasn't really done anything to raise his value. I doubt anything of value would be returned if he were actually moved. He is only on a one year contract at a cap hit of 1.5 mill, so I doubt that trading him is a priority, and definitely wouldn't change much even if he were dealt.

As much as I would like for Gionta to be traded, I seriously doubt anybody would trade for him, especially at a cap hit of 5 million. Too many teams are already against the cap, and would most likely be against the idea of moving anybody with any value for Gionta. We might be able to get a B prospect or a late pick for him if we retain salary, but that's about it. He isn't necessarily the guy teams are looking for at the deadline. Realistic scenario is that he walks at the end of the season, which is good enough for me. God forbidding we re-sign him.

Markov is the only real option in terms of trade out of the three players. We could net a substantial return that could definitely help the habs moving forward. I believe many teams would be interested in acquiring such a guy at the deadline.

I don't understand all of the hate for Bergevin to be honest. The hate is completely unwarranted as far as I'm concerned. Every trade and signing has to be judged in context, which many people forget. I seriously think people will be eating their own words in about 2 or 3 years when this team has been molded into a contending team.

It's not about having the balls to make a trade, its about what the return is for the trade, and what the implications of those trades will be. I'd rather MB hold off on any moves that don't make our team better, or that gear up to make our team better in the future, than make panic moves (Cough*Gauthier*Cough) and accept anything he can get for a player at that point in time. MB has a specific value set for every player, and if that value isn't met in a trade, he isn't going to pull the trigger. Simple as that.

/ Thread Hijack

I'm was happy to see Price getting recognized for his stellar play this season, specifically in the past couple of weeks. Hopefully he rides this momentum into the Olympics as Team Canada's starting goaltender, which he very well should be IMO.
 

JurequeparJuraj

Registered User
Feb 20, 2013
392
146
by the sea
Carey Price from now on this year, and for the 10 next, will be the dominant force in the net that we are actually seeing.

Man that would be so nice.

Being set with that level of goaltending all the time no more question, no more doubt, no more hate, we have one of the best we know it, he's elite out there every games for us.

Now just build a proper team around so we can win some****.
 

Price My Man Crush

Registered User
Aug 27, 2011
4,828
0
Montréal
Dreger is literally the worst. For anyone who actually likes him, go sit in the stands when his kid is playing and then reassess your opinion :laugh::laugh:

What is he doing when he's watching his kid?

Don't tell me this guy works at TSN and screams like an idiot at the ice rink? Or screams at the refs?

Omfg.
 

25get

Registered User
Nov 15, 2012
1,946
0
Montreal
Only one of those three guys are moveable. If anybody wanted Murray, they would have signed him for 1.5 mill in the offseason, and he hasn't really done anything to raise his value. I doubt anything of value would be returned if he were actually moved. He is only on a one year contract at a cap hit of 1.5 mill, so I doubt that trading him is a priority, and definitely wouldn't change much even if he were dealt.

As much as I would like for Gionta to be traded, I seriously doubt anybody would trade for him, especially at a cap hit of 5 million. Too many teams are already against the cap, and would most likely be against the idea of moving anybody with any value for Gionta. We might be able to get a B prospect or a late pick for him if we retain salary, but that's about it. He isn't necessarily the guy teams are looking for at the deadline. Realistic scenario is that he walks at the end of the season, which is good enough for me. God forbidding we re-sign him.

Markov is the only real option in terms of trade out of the three players. We could net a substantial return that could definitely help the habs moving forward. I believe many teams would be interested in acquiring such a guy at the deadline.

I don't understand all of the hate for Bergevin to be honest. The hate is completely unwarranted as far as I'm concerned. Every trade and signing has to be judged in context, which many people forget. I seriously think people will be eating their own words in about 2 or 3 years when this team has been molded into a contending team.

It's not about having the balls to make a trade, its about what the return is for the trade, and what the implications of those trades will be. I'd rather MB hold off on any moves that don't make our team better, or that gear up to make our team better in the future, than make panic moves (Cough*Gauthier*Cough) and accept anything he can get for a player at that point in time. MB has a specific value set for every player, and if that value isn't met in a trade, he isn't going to pull the trigger. Simple as that.

/ Thread Hijack

I'm was happy to see Price getting recognized for his stellar play this season, specifically in the past couple of weeks. Hopefully he rides this momentum into the Olympics as Team Canada's starting goaltender, which he very well should be IMO.
Here is where the ball stops rolling...

So what do you think we could get for Markov?

Anything below a top-15 or a top prospect ready for NHL would be stupid.

Do you think we can get a prospect who could be top-6 (or top-4 in defense) within two years?

For now, only the Sens gave up their first round pick in the Ryan vs Jakob Silfverberg, Stefan Noesen trade.
But Ryan had more value than Markov because his contract was running for many years.

Obviously, it would have to be a contender because a team who won't make the PO will not trade for Markov on a UFA year.
So it has to be on the top-50 prospects from a team who wants to make the PO... Who do you see in that list?
Coyle, Subban, Dumba, Forsberg, Ristolainen, Kreider, Bjugstad, Despres?

What is substantial value?

Edit: I do agree that Murray and Gionta won't bring us anything.
 

habtastic

Registered User
Aug 17, 2007
10,529
116
Montrealer in Boston
As I alluded to in my earlier post. All Price discussion are fueled by hatters, not supporters.

So true.

We tend only to post incessantly about things that bother us. Kind of like the phenomenon of side effects (of a drug, let's say) being disproportionately weighted compared to the lack thereof, on the internet.

We all know Carey is godly this year and is amazingly getting better each day.

Feels good (man) that everyone recognizes this.

Now...the comments about PK re: Team Canada, by the other Canadians...oh boi:help:
 

NobleSix

High Tech Low-Life.
Apr 20, 2013
16,914
15,933
CyberSpace
www.ilovebees.co
Here is where the ball stops rolling...

So what do you think we could get for Markov?

Anything below a top-15 or a top prospect ready for NHL would be stupid.

Do you think we can get a prospect who could be top-6 (or top-4 in defense) within two years?

For now, only the Sens gave up their first round pick in the Ryan vs Jakob Silfverberg, Stefan Noesen trade.
But Ryan had more value than Markov because his contract was running for many years.

Obviously, it would have to be a contender because a team who won't make the PO will not trade for Markov on a UFA year.
So it has to be on the top-50 prospects from a team who wants to make the PO... Who do you see in that list?
Coyle, Subban, Dumba, Forsberg, Ristolainen, Kreider, Bjugstad, Despres?

What is substantial value?

Edit: I do agree that Murray and Gionta won't bring us anything.

If Markov is moved, I would expect nothing more than a B+\ A- prospect, or a mid first round pick. However, I said we could, as in its possible, to get a team to overpay for Markov. Is getting a 1st round pick and a good prospect a realistic return? I'm not sure it is. But would I be absolutely baffled if we managed to net that kind of return? Not necessarily. I was using the term "substantial" in relation to what we would get for Murray and Gionta. We would get next to nothing for those guys, and anything of value we could get for Markov would be considered substantial compared to the garbage we would get for Murray and Gionta. I wasn't saying we would land a top 10 pick and an NHL ready prospect who could fit into our top 6 right away.

Most contending teams wont want to break the bank for Markov, and no Rebuilding team will dish out assets for him either. However, it only takes one team who is willing to take that extra step in order to gear up for the playoffs for a good deal to be made.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad