SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 13,405
- 11,549
Better peaks? Kane. Better player overall? Maybe Datsyuk.
Better career? Hands down, Kane.
Weirdly defensive post given you’re quoting someone who has minor disagreements with you, but ok.Without question Patrick Kane.
How? Datsyuk was on powerhouse teams and his first Cup run was a top nine forward.
Kane was the best forward on three cup winners.
Weirdly defensive post given you’re quoting someone who has minor disagreements with you, but ok.
It’s a bit weird that you are identifying Datsyuk as “top nine” and then Kane as “the best forward in three cup winners.” You appear to be picking convenient language there.
Datsyuk and Kane have had relatively equally productive careers and the older of the two gets the slight benefit in a dead offensive era. Datsyuk is the superior well-rounded player when considering defensive play. Kane has had the better peak. Kane is more decorated and has an extra cup. That is how my post came to its conclusions. Thank you.
Better career, Kane because of the hardwares.
But Kane's extra offensive contribution does not even come close to making up for Datsyuk's ridiculously better defensive play imo (especially considering Kane has been a complete liability in that regard for most of his career), so Datsyuk as the better player for me in his prime
What was Datsyuk on the 2002 cup run?
When do you think prime Crosby was lolKane beat a prime Sidney Crosby out for a Ross and Hart.
What was Datsyuk on the 2002 cup run?
Who was better than Kane in the three cup wins? Toews in 2010 you could argue but Kane was more consistent through every round and won the cup.
Datsyuk was never the best player in the league. Kane was.
You certain that Datsyuk was never the best player in the league? When was Kane the best player in the league?Kane beat a prime Sidney Crosby out for a Ross and Hart.
What was Datsyuk on the 2002 cup run?
Who was better than Kane in the three cup wins? Toews in 2010 you could argue but Kane was more consistent through every round and won the cup.
Datsyuk was never the best player in the league. Kane was.
You certain that Datsyuk was never the best player in the league? When was Kane the best player in the league?
Cool dude. What’s your point? What was Kane on the 2002 cup run? 14 years old, that’s what.
Your point makes literally zero sense whatsoever.
When do you think prime Crosby was lol
Well shucks, by this logic, why even compare players? It’s obvious that Kane is better because he was a higher draft pick. Why didn’t we all think of that?! I guess we can take this logic and declare that Patrick Stefan was also in fact better than Pavel Datsyuk.Datsyuk entered the league as a 3rd / 4th liner.
Kane immediately was the foundational player on the Hawks dynasty. From the moment he joined the league the Hawks were immediately a contender.
Kane was a top line player in 3 cup runs. Datsyuk was in 2.
Well shucks, by this logic, why even compare players? It’s obvious that Kane is better because he was a higher draft pick. Why didn’t we all think of that?! I guess we can take this logic and declare that Patrick Stefan was also in fact better than Pavel Datsyuk.
And yet you’re still failing to make your point. Great, Kane was more instrumental in his team winning not just two but three Stanley Cups. We agree. Better career. Now generally please tell me how that makes him a better player. By your logic, let’s ask an example question: is Nikolai Khabibulin a better player than Roberto Luongo?
Career-wise, Ovi is a lot closer to Crosby than Datsyuk is to Kane, so the position isn't as indefensible.People taking Kane, I wonder if they’d also pick Ovi over Crosby.
Give me the better full-ice player any day of the week. Datsyuk.
People taking Kane, I wonder if they’d also pick Ovi over Crosby.
Give me the better full-ice player any day of the week. Datsyuk.