Coldplay619
Registered User
- Oct 17, 2010
- 2,825
- 863
I've said it all year. Ovi has slowed down and he lacks the aggression/energy in his game. Watch him closely next game and you will notice he doesn't engage in puck battles and if he does, he loses every one. He just watches and waits for his line mates to get the puck back. Unbelievably frustrating to watch.
Or maybe he's going through a rough patch. He's human, right? That machine joke has taken on a life of its own.
Is anyone else worried about Ovi? He's been playing like this for most of the season. The Caps aren't winning anything until he gets his head out of his ass. The depth is winning the Caps games now but he needs to get going eventually before it's too late.
Take the point, get on the plane, prepare for tomorrow.
I doubt it will be pretty.
I don't expect him to score every night. Not at all. I'm more concerned by a lack of worth ethic, not the scoring. He needs to find a way to make an impact on the game when he isn't scoring, beyond being a decoy, and that means winning puck battles.
Sucks to lose but I didn't think it was that bad of a performance. They were clearly rusty for a period and Mrazek was excellent once they shook off the rust.
Edit: ^^yes indeed. I'm not normally a fan of fighting but I can always get behind Steve Ott getting punched.
To get a point was a pretty good result today.
As for Ovi, again, the limited effort is not some new thing to worry about. If anything, his backcheck is much better than it used to be. In reality, everything was glossed over by lots of goals -- so when that dries up people start noticing the other stuff.
I'm not sure I see a big decline in ability, either. Surely, he's getting slower, but it's not particularly drastic year-to-year. Puck control issues are also nothing new, and not unexpected after a week off.
He is what he is -- a world-class turret that still has some moves and an underrated passing ability. I'm more concerned about Backstrom's line's overall speed in playoffs (or ability to negate speed).
At this stage both Ovechkin and Carlson are my biggest concerns with this lineup. From what I saw today, Carlson looked to be no fresher after the time off. It seemed quite the contrary with him sucking wind after shifts and being just as sluggish as usual.
Caps are set then because unless this year is different from all the other years they will be the two guys who show up the most come playoff time.
I'm concerned about Ovechkin but I really think a lot of his poor play is because he and Backstrom don't have the same ES chemistry they used to have. I'd highly consider flipping Kuznetsov and Backstrom. 8-92-77 can and have played a very fast and effective transition game, while 90-19-14 can and have played an effective cycling, possession game and should be used as the shutdown line.
It's frustrating seeing the 8-19-77 line amongst the worst possession lines on the team night in and night out. Their individual talent level allows them to typically score a decent amount but it's far from an optimized lineup decision IMO, seeing as they were a pretty poor relative possession line last season too and the alternative top 6 I mentioned routinely had dominant possession (and goal) numbers.
Here's a post I made about my ideal top 6 in the analytics thread
I'm concerned about Ovechkin but I really think a lot of his poor play is because he and Backstrom don't have the same ES chemistry they used to have. I'd highly consider flipping Kuznetsov and Backstrom. 8-92-77 can and have played a very fast and effective transition game, while 90-19-14 can and have played an effective cycling, possession game and should be used as the shutdown line.
It's frustrating seeing the 8-19-77 line amongst the worst possession lines on the team night in and night out. Their individual talent level allows them to typically score a decent amount but it's far from an optimized lineup decision IMO, seeing as they were a pretty poor relative possession line last season too and the alternative top 6 I mentioned routinely had dominant possession (and goal) numbers.
Here's a post I made about my ideal top 6 in the analytics thread
Anyway, my take on Ovi, Backstrom and Kuz is that fundamentally they each need TWO linemates with pretty high work-rate to make up for being a deficient-to-average in that department.
Ovi more so -- he puts a very heavy burden on his linemates to get the puck back, so he needs a real horse of a center that will cover a lot of ground for him. A guy like Backstrom or Kuz can be "wasted" on Ovi, because the increase in nice passes is balanced out by them having a hard time getting the puck back. So may end up geting roughly same results as with a cheaper option (Zubrus back in the day).
Visually, part of the reason why Oshie has been a decent fit with Ovi is that he works hard to retrieve pucks and keep plays alive, giving the team more chances to put the puck on Ovi's stick. But one guy like that may not be enough to counterbalance Ovi's negative contribution.
How about he gets his legs going and start digging the damn puck with his line mates? He shouldn't have to be spoon fed scoring opportunities like that. The old Ovi used to be everywhere, he didn't need anyone to do all the dirty work for him.