g00n
Retired Global Mod
- Nov 22, 2007
- 30,677
- 14,847
I had no faith in Peters at all myself but I still think we could have won that game with him in net.
Based on what? That same thing from before: speculation?
We COULD win any given game 20-0 but that doesn't make it likely or something a sound hockey analyst would consider relevant to other speculative discussions. We COULD have won with Peters in net for that one game but how likely was it, really? Would you bet your job on it? Do you expect a GM to?