hockeykicker
Moderator
- Dec 3, 2014
- 35,207
- 12,809
So many around here were willing to sell low on each of Eller, Connolly, and Burakovsky at various points in this season. That line was terrific tonight. Really showing the value that having depth scoring lines can provide for a hockey team. They're not going to produce every single night (if they did, they'd be paid a few million more each), but they can chip in timely goals over the course of a season.
AGREE... but opposing fans (w/the usual playoff references) are going to start paying attention if the Caps remain at/near top of Metro.
Disagree. Their forward depth is lined up as it should be. DSP has been outplayed by Chiasson and both are fourth-liners. The main argument in favor of moving a top nine W should be promoting Stephenson so that he can play more and with better, faster linemates but it's still better to be more stacked up front in the regular season. Boyd to me is neither a no-doubt top niner nor fourth-liner so the fit isn't really there.The Caps depth is at F. DSP and Boyd both belong in the top 12, IMO.
It's the Caps D that's thin. Chorney arguably doesn't belong in the 6, and Ness sure as hell doesn't.
I'd like to see an F for D swap. I'm not married as to which player should go (never wanted Eller sent out, it should be a W)....but I think one should.
I don't think that's gonna happen. Tampa is taking the spot light this year in the East.
Usual suspects scoring, very nice. I think Trotz's face after the win said it all
Also, anyone noticed Kuzy tried to score on Bishop the same way he did once but on opposite side? Ridiculous. Only defender prevented that goal! Could have been cruel.
i would assume grubauer friday night in arizona and holtby sat night in vegas?
All it will take is for TB to stub their toe and the Caps are in their grill.
Disagree. Their forward depth is lined up as it should be. DSP has been outplayed by Chiasson and both are fourth-liners. The main argument in favor of moving a top nine W should be promoting Stephenson so that he can play more and with better, faster linemates but it's still better to be more stacked up front in the regular season. Boyd to me is neither a no-doubt top niner nor fourth-liner so the fit isn't really there.
It would be one thing if there was a D injury. Barring that, they should let it play out. They do have some Hershey options developing that could be considered. As-is they're mostly settling into form. I still don't know whether their possession game and top six consistency/IQ/motor is quite strong enough to compensate for some of the inexperience they have on D or general lapses but Djoos & Bowey aren't forcing a move.
I could maybe see an eventual DSP or Graovac swap for a Chorney level defender or something but that's minor tweaking.
Can't wait to trade for Mike Green as the missing piece to this year's team.
AGREE... but opposing fans (w/the usual playoff references) are going to start paying attention if the Caps remain at/near top of Metro.
He's known as a streaky player, wouldn't be surprised if he scores 10 in the next 15 gamesThat was a fun game to watch and I replayed the Orlov goal few times on my DVR lol. I hope this is Bura's breakout game because he sure has a shot. Lots to like about winning in Dallas.
The issue is subtracting from the top nine (or the backup) in favor of insurance on D just in case. D depth is important but not to that extent, esp. if regulars are performing well. I could see it if there was a performance issue but short of that or an injury the likes of Johansen, Siegethaler, Hobbs and Lewington could also be of some help. System familiarity alone can be helpful and any 7/8 acquired when healthy will have to gain that based mainly on video and practice. That's tough and not something I'd go out of the way to address beyond a DSP/Graovac type deal and maybe a small future (again, unless there's an issue). If you're giving up a 65 or 10 it should be for an outright upgrade over Bowey and someone that could be fringe top four quality.There will be a D injury in the playoffs. There always is. We cant assume that the current group wont get dinged (we've already lost Niskanen for a spell...both Orpik and to a lesser degree Carlson have missed time due to injuries over the past few years.
Thinking about our in-season defensive depth trades in the past 7-8 years gives me heartburn. I’m in no hurry for that. I’m not even sure a proven 6 or 7 guy gives us much more than a Hershey guy with top 4 genes. We’ve been burned in recent years by speed, not necessarily mistakes of inexperience.The issue is subtracting from the top nine (or the backup) in favor of insurance on D just in case. D depth is important but not to that extent, esp. if regulars are performing well. I could see it if there was a performance issue but short of that or an injury the likes of Johansen, Siegethaler, Hobbs and Lewington could also be of some help. System familiarity alone can be helpful and any 7/8 acquired when healthy will have to gain that based mainly on video and practice. That's tough and not something I'd go out of the way to address beyond a DSP/Graovac type deal and maybe a small future (again, unless there's an issue). If you're giving up a 65 or 10 it should be for an outright upgrade over Bowey and someone that could be fringe top four quality.
Any moves can wait, though. The next couple months should be about settling into form, developing and re-assessing. The division seems wide open but it's hard to single out glaring roster deficiencies. For me it's the Beagle and Chiasson spots in terms of pace and speed 5-on-5 but as trusted PKers I'm not sure that happens. Everything else is more contingent on development and gaining further cohesion.