TheHudlinator
Registered User
I think he just wants to make sure everyone is putting *'s next to these wins...
Usually he is a good poster I don't think he is. I think we all know that injuries happen the good teams win with them.
I think he just wants to make sure everyone is putting *'s next to these wins...
I disagree this season is about winning if Irving gives us a better chance (couldn't be much worse then Kipper monday) then I would give him the start it would be the first time in years Kipper would have to work to get playing time 1 game isn't going to ruin him.
If this season is about winning, you play Kipper plain & simple. And Irving can be much worse.
That was one of Kipper's worse game in a long time maybe some time off helps him get his **** together. Most other teams use their backups alot to keep their starters fresh but in Calgary with a 36 year old goalie we just let him play through fatigue. I will never understand the philosophy this team and the majority of its fans use towards Kipper.
When you have a workhorse (which almost every team loves to have) you work him. I'll agree that he's probably been played too much the past few years out of need (5-10 games). If we had a proven backup, then ya give them some time if Kipper is struggling, but Irving is far from proven. Irving should only get his start when we have the need to rest Kipper. From there it is up to Irving.
When you have a workhorse (which almost every team loves to have) you work him. I'll agree that he's probably been played too much the past few years out of need (5-10 games). If we had a proven backup, then ya give them some time if Kipper is struggling, but Irving is far from proven. Irving should only get his start when we have the need to rest Kipper. From there it is up to Irving.
It's a little hard for Irving to prove himself while sitting on the bench all time.
All the more reason to impress when he gets the chance. That's the nature of the beast for backups in any sport.
Dreger just had a segment on TSN where he listed team needs. Options were goaltender, defense or centre.
The Flames apparently need a goaltender but not a centre. As much as I would like to dismiss this off hand, Dreger does seem to have some connections with the Flames organization - and given the way they've treated Irving, I wouldn't be surprised if they moved him along with other assets for a back up veteran goaltender. Seems like the short sighted move this organization tends to make.
Sounds to me like they're looking for a 3rd stringer. As they should. Irving is unproven.
Sounds to me like they're looking for a 3rd stringer. As they should. Irving is unproven.
It's a little hard for Irving to prove himself while sitting on the bench all time.