lennor
Registered User
- Oct 15, 2019
- 357
- 343
They love it in North Delta. From Sungod to Rogers Arena
Correct. I watched him play live against the Admirals and then also against the Wolves a few times and on TV dozens of times.Yep. But he's clearly just an AHL star now.
Pearson on the 4th line and Petan on the second…day drinking!
So basically the new Troy stretcher. Cause he’s a local kid he’s good and ya let’s pencil him in on the second line lol
Touché lolConsidering Stecher is a 2nd pair calibre defenseman, if this analogy is correct, then I'll be looking pretty smart in a few months.
He's one of those guys that everyone loves because he was a Junior star and AHL star and came up through the ranks with that pedigree. So well past expiration date...people seem inclined to think there's still "potential" and "upside" in there. When really...he is what he is, as a useful AHL scorer that you can call up for a few games and maybe not hurt you too badly in the NHL. But just too limited to make good on that "offensive skill" in the big leagues. Sort of the opposite trajectory version of a Linden Vey or Cal O'Reilly...only to end up in ultimately the same place.
Good signing for Abbotsford though. As long as that's where he stays, barring a wash of injuries or other unfortunate proceedings with the NHL team.
It's interesting.....Hockey DB lists Petan as a 'center' and it would be intriguing to see him left in the middle for the Abby Canucks. Seems to me that his struggles in the NHL were the result of his size, and the fact that Winnipeg and TO tried to make a winger out of him. Pretty tough to play in the NHL as a 5'9", 175 pound winger, unless you're exceptionally talented.I think he's a lock to be the top center in Abbotsford. I wouldn't rule out him getting a few games in injury relief with the big club at some point (We are all Canucks - Injuries are going to happen). But he should be a marquee guy for Abbotsford.
Lol..this didn’t age well..Pearson on the 4th line and Petan on the second…day drinking!
I don't get why Petan got so many pre-season opportunities. Is it some sort of lip service? Like hey we gave you every chance to make the team and you did because Boeser was injured.
I don't get why Petan got so many pre-season opportunities. Is it some sort of lip service? Like hey we gave you every chance to make the team and you did because Boeser was injured.
i think petan was competing with dowling for the motte slot and lost in the end.
I think they experimented with Petan to see if he was an option for the third-fourth lines, or in a penalty killing role.
I don't get it either. If the plan was to send him down the whole time, why base the entire preseason around Petan in a top-six role? Why not try somebody else.
And I'd still legit rather have Petan on the roster than Chiasson.
At the very least, if Petan is going to be in Abbottsford, please play him with Klimovich.
It was really weird. It wasn't like it was a 'someone had to get the minutes' thing - he was consistently playing higher up in the lineup than Garland, and there was one game where he got 20+ minutes on the top line while Garland was on a 3rd line with Dowling and Di Giuseppe.
As someone noted in the other thread, you wonder if this wasn't an in-fighting thing with Green and Benning, where Green wanted the player on his team and Benning absolutely did not.
Green's comments in the preseason sure seemed to indicate he thought he was an NHLer, and I doubt Petan could have played any better than he did.
i think petan was competing with dowling for the motte slot and lost in the end.
this move plus the chiasson move from 1st line to bench makes me think personnel assignments are more structured this year, and maybe not green's exclusive call. in the past i would have expected chiasson to have slipped gradually down the lineup at the expense of whoever in the bottom six was playing least well.
and if you want to get conspiracy theory, the fact dowling was on the 2nd pp might be because green was planning to put petan there.
Except that wasn't how he was used at all in the preseason.
They didn't play him with Di Giuseppe/Dowling/Highmore/Dickinson types to see how he fit in the bottom-6. They put him on a top scoring line and played the living hell out of him in offensive situations all preseason. Again, he got substantially better minutes/looks than Garland did.