Can I stroke another fire?
Subban $755K per
Stewart $925K per
Source:
https://www.hockeyscap.com/teams/canucks
http://www.generalfanager.com/teams/28
http://www.hockeybuzz.com/cap-central/team.php?team=VAN
Now... likely due to the fact SUbban is more likely to actually earn that money at the NHL level, whereas Stewart is going require the full 3+ yrs in the A without a sniff of the NHL money... but still made me laugh knowing the tone of this thread..
Have at her...
Hahaha, that's insane.
Obviously we were playing hardball with Subban. Labate and Sautner get the rookie max in the NHL as well.
Contract details are unknown, maximum allowable contract has been assumed until details are confirmed.
That $925K is just a placeholder until Stewart's salary is known.
That $925K is just a placeholder until Stewart's salary is known.
http://www.generalfanager.com/players/1903
Contract details are unknown, maximum allowable contract has been assumed until details are confirmed.
So Benning did try to hardball Subban it seems. lol.
It's becoming pretty clear that Benning has absolutely no idea how to evaluate talent.
Sbisa, Dorsett, Stewart, Miller, Vey the only good moves he's got just seemed like he lucked into them. Like Vrbata and Baertschi.
So Stewart got the maximum ELC $? Does Jimbo not realize that Stewart had ZERO leverage?!
If that is the case, I obviously retract my previous comments.
If they're fast-tracking him to the AHL (as Benning's quote says), then, yes, this is really bad. Because he's one of Benning's pets, you can bet he'll be given ice time over deserving prospects. This will hurt Utica, and it will hurt the Canucks. Travis Green may be all that stands between reason and nonsense here, and it may not be his call.
Yet another example of this regime being totally uninterested in evidence and actual evaluation. They just like a guy because of his style or past connections, so they boost his status in the organization regardless of how he actually performs (e.g. Sbisa, Dorsett, Vey). This is the precise opposite of the "Moneyball" knowledge of sports that became popular in the early 2000s. It is promoting guys with a square jaw over guys who get results. This is Hugo Chavez-style governance where ideology comes before prosperity.
I still wouldn't be surprised. Remember when Stefan Schneider got a max ELC too? And Gillis was 1000x better at negotiating contracts than Jimbo, so anything is possible.
That $925K is just a placeholder until Stewart's salary is known.
http://www.generalfanager.com/players/1903
That's pretty standard for undrafted UFAs like Schneider though.
Its awesome how easy people justify Gillis' awful moves and awful drafting.
Its awesome how easy people justify Gillis' awful moves and awful drafting.
No, some people just understand the difference between a UFA and a draft pick. Pretty much any undrafted UFA with more than 1 team interested in him can command a $900K NHL salary with a signing bonus.
a wasted contract spot is a wasted contract spot, is the point.
Gillis takes tons of criticism - justifiably - for his failure to make substantial changes to our scouting until his 5th year as GM. Absolutely, he allowed the influence of Delorme to lead to some terrible signings like Stefan Schneider.
Which is why it's doubly frustrating to see that lump Delorme back in a position to influence horrible signings like this after he had finally been marginalized.
Although some of his moves leave you scratching your head, you have give props to Benning....The guy seems to be utterly convinced in the upward potential of the guys he drafts or trades for.....Stewart signing indicates he really believes his guy will someday be better than he's looked the past couple of WHL seasons.....same with Sbisa.....and shudder to say it, but Kyle Pettit didn't look all that bad for Erie in the OHL finals, considering how much time he's missed...guess only time will tell whether his drafts or the guys he's acquired like Baertschi, Vey, Clendening and Pedan all pan out.