- May 25, 2014
- 45,785
- 31,100
So Jeichel Risto and J Hughes for Pettersson and Horvat?If we have Hughes and Vancouver wants him, the conversation starts with Pettersson.
Your proposal is REJECTED
So Jeichel Risto and J Hughes for Pettersson and Horvat?If we have Hughes and Vancouver wants him, the conversation starts with Pettersson.
Lawlz. Why would we entertain trading a better player for a worse one? This should be extended to Horvat for Risto.If we have Hughes and Vancouver wants him, the conversation starts with Pettersson.
If we have Hughes and Vancouver wants him, the conversation starts with Pettersson.
He was honest, and so were you. There ago, no trade to be had here.And ends very quickly
Buffalo wouldn't trade the 1st over all, nor the 2nd over all for that matter.
Now, if Buffalo ends up with 4th or 75th over all, Risto and the 4th/5th over all, Horvat doesn't get it done. Petterson is what gets it done imo.
Risto averages 40 points a season. I think there’s only 12 other Dmen in the league who average that. He plays on a terrible team. He’s easily worth a 1st and much more.Ristolainen is not worth a 1st round pick...
Horvat is worth more than a defensively inept d-man and a player you HOPE to one day be as effective as Horvat (chances are he'll never be)
The takes on Ristolainen in this trade forum are getting absolutely embarassing. I've stopped trying to engage in conversations with these people because it really leads nowhere productive. I think he gets traded this offseason and these people will look very stupid.Risto averages 40 points a season. I think there’s only 12 other Dmen in the league who average that. He plays on a terrible team. He’s easily worth a 1st and much more.
One of the problems is that the Canucks defence if awful, not even close to being good enough to support a Ristolainen type of player. So that means it's Jack Hughes for Horvat plus a high first. And Horvat is already a #1C. It's not for sure that Jack becomes a #1C (I think he will become a good first line player but it's not definite, plus he may play Wing at the NHL level while Vancouver needs a center). So why would Vancouver trade a for sure #1C for a maybe? Yes Jack has a high ceiling, but Horvat is also improving every year.Wait, so the sabres give up hughes and ristolainen, and canucks fans are saying no?
Risto is definitely worth a late 1st.......and for the "defensively inept D-Men" has been gone for a few games and we have given up 4,5,5 goals....so guess we aren't giving up goals simply because Risto is bad he just plays the most minutes on a team that can't play defense. You can stick 99% of the D-man in the same position for TOI for the Sabres in all of those years and expect a similar result.Ristolainen is not worth a 1st round pick...
Horvat is worth more than a defensively inept d-man and a player you HOPE to one day be as effective as Horvat (chances are he'll never be)
Ristolainen is not worth a 1st round pick...
Horvat is worth more than a defensively inept d-man and a player you HOPE to one day be as effective as Horvat (chances are he'll never be)
So Jeichel Risto and J Hughes for Pettersson and Horvat?
Your proposal is REJECTED
Bo Horvat is a fine player, but he has 59 points in a career year and ranks 37th among centres in scoring.
#1c? Too good a player to risk for the #1 overall pick? Really?
Bo Horvat is a fine player, but he has 59 points in a career year and ranks 37th among centres in scoring.
#1c? Too good a player to risk for the #1 overall pick? Really?
Buffalo would rather have Hughes and Risto than Boeser and Trouba3 way deal:
Canucks < 1st overall pick (Hughes)
Sabres < Boeser, Trouba
Winnipeg < Risto, Canuck's 1st round pick